There is no shortage of examples of how such power has worked in the past nor how it continues to work within the current times. One does not need to look hard in order to see the way that hard power is exhibited within the current global system. For instance, when one considers the way in which key nations within the past decade have utilized hard power to influence the way in which other nations behave, it becomes clearly obvious that the utilization of hard power is far from having experienced its epoch at the end of the Cold War as some political scientists had previously stated. Moreover, in the current time, one can quickly see evidence of the way in which hard power is currently in use against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Whereas no stated military action has taken place as yet, the fact remains that economic sanctions and the continual threat of military force acts as a prime exemplification of how hard power still remains a key mechanism by which nations seek to coerce others to their own particular desires or viewpoint on given issues.Such a real world example of the means by which hard power itself is still in very real application helps the reader to understand that the practice of implementing such a form of power has anything but faded from popularity as a means of accomplishing goals within the context of international relations (Zakaria 2008, p. Moreover, although the use of hard power remains practically undiminished within the current system, it is the belief of this author that the diminishing returns that successful application of hard power return have necessarily helped to weaken the appeal that it formerly had as primary tool to accomplish one’s goals. It is the further belief of this author that the diminished appeal that hard power has for those that would seek to use it is concentric upon the fact that the world has globalized so such a high degree that the systemic pressures that successful hard power implementation necessarily bears negatively impacts not only on the target of the hard power but also on the practitioner as well. In effect, hard power is less effective as a painful mechanism to the offender due to the highly integrated and globalised nature of the modern world (Ferguson 2011, p. As such, of all of the types of power that will be defined, this one perhaps has the most negative externalities
Coutu, D 2008, Smart Power, Harvard Business Review, 86, 11, pp. 55-59, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 15 January 2013.
Nye, Joseph, (2011), The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs.
Nye, Joseph, (2005), Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York: Public Affairs.
Nye Jr., J, & Wang, J 2009, Hard Decisions on Soft Power, Harvard International Review, 31, 2, pp. 18-22, Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 15 January 2013.
Rachman, Gideon, (2010), Zero-Sum World: Politics, Power and Prosperity After the Crash, London: Atlantic Books.
Ferguson, Niall, (2011), Civilization: The West and the Rest, London: Allen Lane, 2011.
Kupchan, Charles, (2012), No Ones World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zakaria, Fareed, (2008), The Post-American World, New York: Norton.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples