Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Wjhat is the nature of science in Social Science Essay Example

Show related essays

Wjhat is the nature of science in Social Science

This is a preview of the 10-page document
Read full text

It is therefore noteworthy to investigate the theories of the philosophers in exploring the science in social science.Social scientists often make use of an eclectic or multiple methodologies, such as the combining of quantitative and qualitative techniques, although the term social research also can encompass a wide umbrella of techniques in and of itself (Kuper and Kuper, 1996).Parsons (1938) affirms that no science develops in a vacuum either socially or intellectually. The scientific content of any given intellectual tradition can be noted as always being closely interwoven with the elements of a different character. In this regard, although the scientific method has developed from and utilizes the use of a practical and experimental approach, theory is noted to still be required in this method as it equips it with a number of benefits. The first of these benefits is that in the vast welter of miscellaneous facts that are present in social science research, theory often provides researchers with selective criteria as to the aspects that can safely be neglected in the research. Parsons (1938) also points out that another benefit of theory as applied to social science research is that it provides a solid basis that can be used not only for the organization and selection of known facts, but also it does this in a manner that helps to reveal the gaps that are present in our existing knowledge and their overall importance. Although social science does have a number of competing theories, the application of these theories to social science can be identified as constituting a critically important guide that helps to point out the direction as to fruitful scientific research.Through the use of numerous logical implications of different analytical systems for each other, theory in social science research is noted to provide a potent source of cross fertilization of different related fields of utmost importance. This often leads to very important developments within a scientific field that would not have taken place if the field had remained in a stage whereby it was theoretically isolated.Other than theory, philosophy is also noted to play a central role in social science research. This is because the philosophical study of social research has been credited with being an important dimension of social science that has the advantage of being able to critically analyze the various problems seen to be inherent

This is a preview of the 10-page document
Open full text

Bibliography

Andersen, M. L., & Taylor, H. F. 2008. Sociology: Understanding a diverse society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Berg, K. E., & Latin, R. W. 2008. Essentials of research methods in health, physical education, exercise science, and recreation. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Bird, A., and Ladyman, J. (Eds.). 2013. Arguing about science. Routledge.

Bishop, Robert.C. 2007. The philosophy of the social sciences. New York: Continuum international publishing group.

Cibangu, K. S. 2012. "Karl Popper and the social sciences." Social Sciences and Humanities: Applications and Theories 1 (2012)

Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

Delanty, Gerard., and Strydom, Piet. (Eds). 2003. Philosophies of social sciences. Maidenhead: Open University Press

Faigman, D. (1995). The evidentiary status of social science under Daubert: Is it" scientific,"" technical," or" other" knowledge?. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(4), p.960.

Feibleman, J. K. 1972. Scientific Method: The Hypothetico-Experimental Laboratory Procedure of the Physical Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Gauch, H. G. 2003. Scientific method in practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Gower, B. 1997. Scientific method: An historical and philosophical introduction. Psychology Press.

Heywood, A. 2000. Key concepts in politics. Macmillan.

Hollis, Martin. 2011. The Philosophy of social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hughes, J. A., & Sharrock, W. W. 1980. The philosophy of social research. London: Longman.

Jarvie, I., & Zamora-Bonilla, J. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. London: SAGE Publications.

Keyes, G. (2010). Teaching the Scientific Method in the Social Sciences. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 10(2), pp.18-28.

Kincaid, H., & Kincaid. 1996. Philosophical foundations of the social sciences: Analyzing controversies in social research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kynell-Hunt, T., & Moran, M. G. 1999. Three keys to the past: The history of technical communication. Stamford, Conn: Ablex Pub. Corp.

Molina, M. J. T. 2007. The Global Scientific Method. Molwick.

Moulton, G. E. 2013. CliffsNotes Praxis II middle school science (0439). Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Nickles, T. 2003. Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Padmanabhan, S. 2014. Handbook of pharmacogenomics and stratified medicine. London: Academic Press.

Parsons, T. 1938. The role of theory in social research. American Sociological Review, 3(1), 13-20.

Popper, R.K. 1996. In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years. Routledge, New York.

Rosenberg, Alexander. 2012. Philosophy of social science. Boulder: Westview Press

Skinner, B. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11(5), p.221.

Trusted, J. 2003. Physics and metaphysics: theories of space and time. Routledge.

Turvey, B. E. 2011. Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis. Burlington: Elsevier Science.

Uddin, M. N., and Hamiduzzaman, M. 2009. The philosophy of science in social research. Journal of International Social Research, 2(6), 654-64.

Zumdahl, S., & DeCoste, D. J. 2014. Introductory chemistry: A foundation. Cengage Learning.

White, P. A. 2000. Causal attribution and Mills methods of experimental inquiry: past, present and prospect. British journal of social psychology, 39(3), 429-447.

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Philosophy, Media, Archaeology
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Philosophy, Law, History
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Wjhat is the nature of science in Social Science
  • Pages: 10 (2500 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: Philosophy
  • Level: Undergraduate
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us