However, it has no control over the several other security related entities. Thus, the secret service, which is seized with the security of the president has been transferred from the Department of Treasury to the DHS. However, the Federal Bureau of Investigation continues to remain with the Department of Justice, despite its significance to homeland security (de Rugy, 2006, p.There has been a marked failure on the part of Congress to match the consolidation of its oversight regarding the constituents of the DHS with the consolidation of the DHS. This is of great importance. Committee chairs have demonstrated their disinterest in surrendering their jurisdiction over the 22 agencies and activities that had been transferred to the DHS (de Rugy, 2006, p.This had compelled the DHS to present itself before 88 congressional committees and subcommittees, in the year 2005. Any agency tends to leave no stone unturned in its attempts to enhance its budgetary allocation. Moreover, agencies prove to be aggressive defenders of their statutory mandates. The extreme diffuseness of the spending on homeland security activities has rendered the contemporary structure profligate (de Rugy, 2006, p.Moreover, Homeland security funds tend to be squandered all over the nation. One of the highest risk prone area of the nation is Washington, D. The first installment of these funds were employed in this area for deploying a computerized car towing system. In addition, $100,000 of these funds were diverted to the mayoral summer jobs program (de Rugy, 2006, p.In addition, spending by the DHS has been subjected to several audits, and none of these audits had disclosed the occurrence of abuse of fraud. In fact, several of the dubious purchases by this department had been permitted by its guidelines. However, no cognizance was taken of the fact that the disbursal system with respect to the homeland security funds was founded on perverted priorities. These audits did not discern any systemic issues. However, some of their recommendations have strengthened the impression that the entire system is farcical (de Rugy, 2006, p.Furthermore, it had been declared in the audit of the DHS by the inspector general that there was an urgent need to improve the efforts to measure and monitor the effect of first responder grants. It was also stated in the inspector general’s report that several of the grants had been provided to
Applebaum, A. (2011, Jan/Feb). Homeland Security Hasnt Made us Safer. Foreign Policy, p. 1.
de Rugy, V. (2006). Are We Ready for the Next 9/11? Reason, 37(10), 24 – 31.
HR 5441 – 109th Congress: Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act. (2006, October 4). Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Prante, T., & Bohara, A. K. (2008). What Determines Homeland Security Spending? An Econometric Analysis of the Homeland Security Grant Program. Policy Studies Journal, 36(2), 243 – 256.
Schulz, G. W. (2009, September 10). Homeland Security Marked By Waste, Lack of Oversight. Retrieved October 16, 2013, from The Center for Investigative Reporting: http://cironline.org/reports/homeland-security-marked-waste-lack-oversight-2296
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples