Weber declares that a social class is the largest component, i not the only component in the totality of class situations in which individual and generational mobility is found (Gane 2005, p As such, hs definition of power in social classes has nothing to do with economic wellbeing as found in the Marxist theory, bt rather dwells on the political and cultural power. Terefore, fr him the basis of social classes relies heavily on the interests of the said classes rather than what they can or cannot do interests of the social classes define the existence of a market.
O the other hand, Krl Max, te founder of Marxism, i of a different school of thought with his philosophy based on economic doctrine and social revolution. A such, te economic theory is based on a well-defined system, wich is structured as a logical array revolving around the notions of value and surplus value (Milios, Dmoulis and Economakis 2002, p The theory is deeply embedded in the theory of class struggles, wich is crucial to his definition of were he rejects all forms of traditional, teoretical and philosophical humanism.
Te humanism rejected in the above case refers to a belief that individual human nature is the main determinant of form and evolution patterns of societies. I addition to Karl’s theory of class struggle between the different social classes, Krl is of the opinion that certain societies have class relations that do not belong to the same form of class power, a they constitute of different class systems. A such, te class system follows the earlier mentioned of power where there are the leaders with social power and the dominated.
Hwever, te two groups are further stratified based on their materialism and historical background. I should, hwever, b noted that this has nothing to do with the culture in spite of the use of historical backgrounds in discerning social classes. Tis is especially so for the capitalist system, wich is permanent and bases its notions on production and political power. Nvertheless, dfferent classes in the society depict the level of social mobility in play and various levels mobility ranging from high to stagnant.
I an open class society, tere is significant mobility owing to the presence of a favourable environment while a closed class society shows little mobility. Sch is attributable to. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples