Stone criticizes Robert Dahl’s “Who Governs?” as being too simplistic from the vantage viewpoint of Lanyi’s balloon. Though Dahl attends to politics really carefully but Stone argues that he pays inadequate attention to systemic interactions including social, political and economic forces. Moreover, Stone says that Dahl defines politics in a narrow way describing elections and their results as the final decision and ignoring political actions that range from incipient protests to the controlling of agenda.The study of urban politics is in need of a few delineated and uncomplicated theories which can be used to derive propositions which can be later tested. According to this viewpoint, the urban politics is recognized as interactive yet complicated. Judging the work of too many researchers is an invitation to a never ending description and detailed interpretation in many particular cases. So it can be easily concluded that Stone and other few urban scholars should continue exploring the intricacy of city governance while a large number of other scholars should aim at identifying analytical and reasoning tools or models that would suggest resolution of relevant facts, causes and relationships.Considering urban regime analytical study, Stone and his coauthors have identified different governance dynamics in different cities. There are however, three major accomplishments which can be concluded as more focused comparison among national policies of vocational training, second; a healthy discussion about the most appropriate way to describe and explain city governance and third is the use of rational models and theories to study cities along with more conventional approaches like surveys, aggregate. Urban Politics.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples