The biblical interpretation should never blind Christians from acknowledging reality (Abbot 32). I this respect, te truths of nature are not covered in the Bible though they are the reality. Tis is reasonably explained since nature is supposed to give each individual greater understanding of the teachings of the Bible. Bsides the truths manifest themselves eventually, fr a example, wen Galileo discovered that the Earth revolves around the Sun, h was made to recant. Cnsequentially, tis and other scientific truths brought to light were accepted but given Biblical their understanding.
A the heart of the argument is the second revelation and the most conflicting one: te beginning of life and how it has developed. Te contradiction is clear, te Bible shows God using his hands to create a being while the theory of evolution explains a long period of the development of human beings. Te argument brings into perspective that none can be claimed to be inferior to the othe, rsince factual evidence and occurrence prove the validity of both ideas. Terefore, te only intelligent and conclusive that there is an unsorted after possibility that there is a connection between the two explanations.
Te supporters of evolution and those of Christianity work for the same purpose. Becher argues that the idea of human life has always been based on development. Cristianity seeks to develop man from his simplicity and ignorance to a superior being (spirit). Tere are those who identify the truth live by it and eventually are rewarded to share in the glory of God. I the same capacity, eolution explains man in the context an animal who develops from the simplicity of life to have a superior mind and life (Beecher 18).
Tis is the reason for the apparent existence of contradictions. Hwever, bth ideas seek understanding of the truth of life and should therefore be identified in the same spirit. Te Bible will always be invaluable even though the human mind develops science to the wildest of imaginations. Te truth is never complete, stisfactory or understood without adherence to its compatibility to life situations. Tis comprehensive fact concludes the whole Becher does want the purpose of this deep insight to be diverted but he is subjective in purpose.
Terefore, te evolutionists and people of varied age, cass, dnominations and beliefs are. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples