Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Is there a constitutional right to possess a firearm for private use

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Read full text

The precursors of guns included bows and arrows, sears, ad other harmful and deadly weapons, lke swords and daggers. The right to possess and bear arms was firmly supported, rtained, ad expanded. All serfs, tnants, ad subjects of the state and of the crown were required to bear arms in order to protect the state (Lyon, 1980). Various evolutions of armaments and weapons were seen throughout the years, ad the people were also required to bear arms when they would travel, atend fairs, o when they would go to (Lyon, 1980).

The people were even asked to train in the use of long-bows and other arms in order to ensure their protection. I the 1500s in England, te crown decided to ban firearms (meaning, bws and arrows); istead a militia was to be trained in the use of these arms (Bagley and Rowley, 1965). This militia would be considered the armed citizenry of the English political system. This move however backfired when the militia turned on the crown and gained temporary control of the government (Bagley and Rowley, This prompted the Parliament to order the search and destruction of all arms from all opponents of the crown.

As the crown was later restored, te military government’s reign ended. In general, al arms by the militia were banned and confiscated (Malcolm, 1980). This control of the militia was carried over to the control of Britain over its American colonies. After persistent moves by the British government to control its American colonials, icluding their rights to bear arms, te need to protect the right to bear arms became an bigger necessity (Patterson, 1973).

Scholars however were quick to point out that the right to bear arms was indeed the right of individual citizens, bt must be based on the peaceful intent and manner in the use of such arms. Tis peaceful basis was supported by the historical development of this right to bear arms (Patterson, 1973). The formulations of Thomas Jefferson and Samuel Adams also reflected these same ideals and goals. The right to bear arms was also based on individual rights of the people which were distinguished the rights of the people and the state (Thurmond, e.

The term militia represented universally armed individuals; ad the framers intended the authority to bear arms for a select militia not for the general militia (Thurmond, e. In effect organized...

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Law, Archaeology, Sociology
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Law, Media, Gender & Sexual Studies
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Is there a constitutional right to possess a firearm for private use
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us