Postman also shows of how the media is responsible for manipulating the public’s social, eonomic, ad political standing by presentation of fictitious information, ad facts. Al these are methods devised by television and other electronic media to divert the public’s attention away from matters that affect them. Te public’s money and energy is directed toward such manipulation, ad eventual subjugation through the media without them realising what is happening. Tis book and all its findings have created the state in which many continents are in today. I is, right to say that communication brought through television and other media is biased and provides information which is destructive to the rational minds of individuals.
After long periods of television watching, oe gets to question and be suspicious of discussions, ad arguments. Tese effects are growing and will continue to mature provided the media is involved in contextualising the lives of people. I this article, Qayle argues that Postman’s conclusions, tough somewhat true, wre a little premature. H did not take the time to correctly evaluate all the factors into play when writing his book.
Tday, acording to Quayle, mny factors contribute to the growth of the medium used to communicate to the public. Tis is unlike how they did twenty-five years ago. H reiterates the fact that Postman did an exceptional job in finding out what affected the media during that time, bt a lot of things have changed. Qayle insists there is a possibility of increasing the public discourse in this modern age of technology. Alot has changed since the last time Postman wrote the on media.
Qayle asserts that the television news space has fully-grown, ad there is more to look for in the media in relation to news. Plitics take centre stage in most television or cable news and many issues addressed. Live interviews give the public something to talk about when their politicians go on air. Adifferent side is seen whenever the news shows air, ad people can participate in all of them. Tis is the difference between then and now, i relation to the media. I the article, Qayle of the standing that faces nations, fr example, te U.
H talks of how the media played a part in informing the public about how the situation could be worse than the recession in 1984. Trough this information, Qayle believes. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples