Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Summary/Critical Response

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Read full text

This main argument, fr instance, Ezioni provided the following reasons to justify that McDonald’s is bad for kids in terms of providing employment at this particular fast food chain: 1) these jobs were asserted to “undermine school attendance and involvement, ipart few skills that would be useful in later life, ad simultaneously skew the values of teen-agers” (Etzioni par. 3; 2) these jobs are highly uneducational; 3) the hours and working days were reported to be too long; 4) supervisory techniques impart wrong lessons in terms of compliance described as blind obedience, a well as shared alienation with the boss (Etzioni par.

14), ad inappropriate and insufficient (where teens were reported to supervise peer teens); 5) inconsistency in administrative or supervisory governance (too tight or too loose); ad (6) pay apparently spent on “flimsy punk clothes, tinkets, ad whatever else is the latest fast-moving teen craze” (Etzioni par. Aother reason why one strongly believes that Etzioni presented effective arguments to support his main point is that the author used and cited previous studies to validate statements that Tere were two studies noted and cited as needed: te 1984 study apparently made by Ivan Charper and Bryan Shore Frazer which supposedly relied on responses made by teen-agers from the questionnaires that were designed; ad the 1980 study conducted by A.

Hrrell and P. Wrtz that aimed to determine the unemployment rate of those who were previously employed at fast food chains as compared to those who stayed in school. I addition, sme statistics and figures were cited to support other arguments. Te assertion that teen-agers render days hours working at fast-food chains cited the Charper and Frazer study which disclosed that more than 30 hours per week were rendered by a third of the employees or approximately 33%; 20% were noted to work for 15 hours or less; ad finally the rest (or 47%) work between 15 and 30 hours per week (Etzioni par.

Lkewise, t further support the arguments, te author used personal experiences and narration such as the story told about his son who worked at Baskin Robbins in upper Manhattan (Etzioni Tis technique effective in soliciting emotional appeal from the audience by visualizing an experience where readers could relate.

Te author also provided a balanced argument by citing some positive aspects at working in a fast food chain including. ..

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Open full text

Related Topics

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: English, Literature, Humanitarian
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: English, Creative Writing, Biographies
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Summary/Critical Response
  • Pages: 4 (1000 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: English
  • Level: Masters
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us