The paper discusses and later criticizes the model focusing on the concept of conscious assessment of strengths and weakness, o the need to make strategies explicit and separation between formulation and implementation (Potter, 2001). I doing so, i question the beliefs in the strategic management. Te critique is not intended to dismiss the design school model; lther, i opposes the assumption of its universality. Te author of the paper has vast experience in promotion of strategic management mostly as a tutor. Te possible audiences for this paper are the tutors, tainers, ad teachers.
Hs move to criticize school model is confusing since he has spent a bigger part of his career in learning institution. “echnology and banking: te implication of technology myopia on banking financial performance. Astrategic management analysis” unpublished DBA dissertation, uited state international university, Sn Diego, 1990. Te author successfully tested the strategic success hypothesis in major united state banks. H determined that the hypothesis was statistically sustained at 0. Te relevance of this study to Henry model lays in the fact the prescription to for formation is identical, wth the type of strategic aggressiveness that optimizes firm success.
Te critique is evaluating Henry’s theory on two criteria, fctual varsity, ad methodological soundness. Te purpose of this paper was to criticize henry theory that disposes the prescriptive school. Te author attains the purpose by: poofing that the method applied by Henry does not stand logic test, ofering instance where Henry key assertion are factually wrong and finally by identifying appropriate context for Henry prediction. Te author of this paper H. Ior, hs spent his entire helping different organization manage their strategic management (Jaja, 1990).
H refuse to accept Henrys verdict, snce by doing so means he has spent 40 year contributing solution that are irrelevant in practice of strategic management. Te probable audience of this paper is university tutors, ad students. Te findings of the critique were; te exposition is deficient in terms of methodology and that descriptive and prescriptive assertions are variance with today’s practice of strategic management. Tis critique is deficient of these two criteria. Te variance is found to be due the following...
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples