The proponents counter the argument that stem cell research leads destroying innocent young life by claiming that the embryo does not have the psychological, eotional and physical properties associated with human beings before it is implanted in to the uterus. I is follows that the embryo lacks the criteria for personhood and thus has not any interests that should be protected and is why it should be used for the future benefit of those who meet the personhood criteria (Freedman, 2007). Acordingly, sme biological studies have suggested that the has no central nervous system before fourteen days and thus fertilization is a process, bt not a ‘moment’ thus stem cell research does not entail destruction of life.
Acording to deontological or duty-based arguments, tere is so much medical suffering among people thus it is moral duty to support stem cell research (Palmquist, 2010). Te research is carried out in approved medical centers for vitrofertilization and according to utilitarian argument its is right to carry out stem cell research since it leads to desirable end for the greatest number citizens in the society.
Sem cells do not necessarily come from the embryo since they can be taken from the umbilical cord, pacenta, aniotic fluid, ault tissues and bone marrow. Ault stem cells have demonstrated ability to cure diseases such as the use of bone marrow cells from the hipbone to repair the scars on the heart after heart attacks (Forman, 2008). Te proponents argue that stem cell research is worthy funding since health care problems since the Second World War have led to advances in clinical research that ultimately led to new vaccines and treatments of controlling new diseases.
I is possible to attain high quality care through replacing the damaged endothelial cells in blood vessels thus helping patients who suffer from Parkinson’s disease or diabetes (Freedman, 2007). Athough stem cell research may seem expensive, is development, tsting and production will outweigh the initial research costs and lead to medical treatments that ultimately reduce healthcare costs (Freedman, 2007). Acording to arguments from the historical and legal precedents is that if the majority approve certain actions then majority right and the research should move ahead.
Mjority of the people support stem cell research and such it should be made a public policy while the minority may disagree with such...
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples