In choosing historical research as his methodology, Locke was able to highlight the limitations of the concept of goal setting and the error of scholars who are supporters of the idea. Likewise, by using a number of works by notable scholars on the subject, he was able to present his propositions in a very scholarly manner.
In the end, though it seems easy to ascend to Locke’s claim, one will still get the idea that Locke is not really offering an epistemological distinction between goal setting and need and values but what he is proposing is a semantic distinction.
The article of Chaffee, she claims that the concept of strategy is one those rare concepts whose application is uncontested. As such, in the paper, she intends to look into the query that despite the seeming agreement among scholars regarding the use of the term strategy there are reasons why it appears that strategy seems to defy definitive definition and those are “first, the strategy is multidimensional. Second, the strategy must be situational…and will vary by industry…strategy suffers from a more fundamental problem…the term strategy refers to three distinguishable mental models rather than the single model that most discussions assume.” (Chaffee 1985, p 89). The Evaluation of Professional Training.
Gerow, J. R. (1995). Psychology: An introduction 4th Edition. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples