These two considered the possible contributions of technology to the field of art and design and the different questions that develop around this field in relation to art and design are what the researcher focuses on. Considering the different contributions both positive and negative develops a clear picture of the contributions that technology has occasioned to the field. The research considers the negatives and positive contributions that technology has led to and considering these, one learns that the technological effects on the art and design field provide more positive effects compared to the negative. These effects include the improvement and simplification that technology has brought into the field. These improvements include the introduction of software items that provide ease for the development of designs for the different design needs that many of the fields in the world today need. The positives outweigh the negatives and these include the provision of software aspects that have hastened the design process. Using technology, complex technological designs and artistic features have been created that provide the different needs of the world. The effects have led to the development of designs that have proven possible for different structures complex as the Burj Khalifa structure in Dubai. Effects Of Technology On The Art And Design Field.
Carr, Nicholas. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” The Atlantic, August 2008.
Fleischmann, Katja. “Collaboration through Flickr & Skype: Can Web 2.0 Technology Substitute the Traditional Design Studio in Higher Design Education?” Contemporary Educational Technology 5 (2014): 39–52.
Herne, Steve, Jeff Adams, Dennis Atkinson, Paul Dash, and John Jessel. “Technology, Learning Communities and Young People: The Future Something Project.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 32, no. 1 (February 2013): 68–82. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01738.x.
Picard, Delphine, Perrine Martin, and Raphaele Tsao. “iPads at School? A Quantitative Comparison of Elementary Schoolchildren’s Pen-on-Paper versus Finger-on-Screen Drawing Skills.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 50, no. 2 (March 2014): 203–12. doi:10.2190/EC.50.2.c.
Postman, Neil. “Technopoly.” Publishers Weekly, December 13, 1991. Literature Resource Center.
Schenk, Pam. “Drawing for Design: The Impact of Computer-Assisted Design on the Role of Drawing for Communication Designers in Commercial Practice.” The Design Journal 1, no. 3 (1998): 44–50.
Schenk, Pamela. “Reflections on the Teaching of Drawing in the Digital Age: Attitudes of Senior Academics in the United Kingdom to the Place of Drawing Tuition on the Design Curriculum in Higher Education.” Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 4, no. 3 (December 2005): 189–203. doi:10.1386/adch.4.3.189/1.
Sefton-Green, J., and D. Buckingham. “Digital Visions: Children’s ‘Creative’ Uses of Multimedia Technologies.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 2, no. 2 (1996): 47–79. doi:10.1177/135485659600200207.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples