Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Reconstruct Morhs two arguments concerning the right against outing in The Outing Controversy: Privacy and Dignity in Gay Ethics. Give an argument for one of Morhs arguments being more convincing than the other. Discuss strengths and weaknesses

This is a preview of the 7-page document
Read full text

Thus, te control over access is the foundation of privacy while hiding is the foundation of secrecy. Te author indicates that if privacy is used to infer to something in a more normative sense, ten the application in turn invokes some of the required norms. Ay act, pssession or even relation that is private in a more normative sense invokes a right to it that bars the unwanted access to it by other people. O one hand, screcy is one’s thoughts and the inner dialogue including secrecy safeguards the judgments that such individuals can get from the public.

Hwever, te private ideas that one has could also be known by the public and might even be published despite an individual’s thinking of them as private. Tese are ideas that are known and acknowledged though the public can never intrude on them. I is important to note that any evil that may exist and survive in a just society happens due to the issue of secrecy. Tis in turn indicates that outing does not invoke on an individual’s privacy an individual’s sexual orientation is the one revealed not their sexual behaviors.

Hwever, tis could also lead to invading the secrecy of an individual which could lead them to be viewed differently in the society. Dspite the overlapping normative privacy and secrecy, tere is no normative privacy. Mhr infers that there is no gay privacy violated by making their sexual orientation public (Mohr, 13). Tlling the public that someone who is not willing to be known as a homosexual, oe reveals a secret. Tis is due to the revelation what was hidden.

Cnveying the secret is only done by revealing that a certain individual has erotic sexual desires for an individual of the same sex. Hwever, tis individual does not convey the sexual behavior of this gay individual. Tere are multiple signs of inferring from the public that a certain individual is gay. Hwever, tere are multiple differences between reporting to the press that an individual is gay and detailing to the same press about the sexual activities of this gay individual. Tis is similar to a normal having sex.

Tis couple expects that what they do in their sex life remains between them. Hwever, i is also possible that some individuals would start viewing the gay people differently if they are outed. Sme of the people in the society view being gay as dirty and disgusting and imagining or digging in the sexual behaviors of this gay individual...

This is a preview of the 7-page document
Open full text

Related Topics

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Philosophy, Politics, Science
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Philosophy, Gender & Sexual Studies, People
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Reconstruct Morhs two arguments concerning the right against outing in The Outing Controversy: Privacy and Dignity in Gay Ethics. Give an argument for one of Morhs arguments being more convincing than the other. Discuss strengths and weaknesses
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us