Burgess (1982) points out that such interview allows the researcher to probe deeply in order to find out ‘expansive’ responses, which often helps in uncovering previously unknown details so that a direction is also provided to future researchers. In the indirect method, on the other hand, the research participants are encouraged to come out with their own versions and understandings about the issue/s being taken up by the researcher. The respondents are supposed to ‘project’ their feelings or attitudes about the situation. Indirect qualitative research, while the in-depth interviews help the researcher in coming out with a thorough knowledge, but it has a couple of disadvantages as well. Conducting an interview is a specialized job in itself, and if the researcher goes for a professional interviewer, that leads to an increase in costs. The quality and comprehensiveness of the results in such type are heavily influenced by the competency of the researcher. Quite often after completing the in-depth interview, if the researcher is able to have lots of data and information, it gives rise to another kind of problem; now it becomes quite an arduous task to tabulate, interpret and analyze the data. . Critical Comparison of Direct and Indirect Qualitative Research Procedures.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples