From the book, Hcker and Pierson describe interest groups as people who got personal interest relating to enriching their business using political influence. Pliticians often require money to run for elections. I often becomes the role of election fundraising that enable them to raise enough money to run for those seats. Pliticians often get lump sum amount of money to campaign, ad once they get into power, sme of them have to do favors on behalf of the fundraiser. Iterest groups on the other hand possess powers that the working of the government, tereby taking critical role in decision making of a government.
Hcker and Pierson provide an excellent example of how some bills become tabled in the assembly in favor of the rich thereby contributing to inequality in the country (Hacker & Pierson 28). Sme fundraisers and interest groups in accordance to Hacker and Pierson (45) often remain as rich people in the society. I most cases, te rich and the government always walk hand in hand as they belong to the same class. Iterest groups to exist ever since 1960s to counter some of the powerful influence directed towards them by trade unions.
I accordance to Pierson and Hacker, iterest groups and key election fundraisers mostly contributed in the decision making process. Ater a lot of cash becomes given to politicians during campaigns, i a way of paying the money contributed to them, pliticians become often obliged to give these people an upper hand when it came to getting business deals with the government. Person and Hacker describe this phenomenon as a way enrich rich while the poor remain poor.
Snce most crucial election fundraisers and interest groups remain rich, plitics to them becomes a means of investing for the future. Wen a given election fundraiser or interest group supports a given politician and joins the government, oe often becomes obliged to repay the money one gave him or her through profit deals. I order to achieve such measures and pressures put on trapped politicians, eonomic laws can be changed in favor to what they intend to do. I overall, iequality created when gap between the rich and the poor widen (Hacker & Pierson 25).
I accordance to Hacker and Pierson (95), iequality in Washington and the rest of United States became majorly brought by an inefficient political system that favored the rich. ...
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples