This impact arose from his assertion that chemistry is not a suitable science. Brakel demonstrates how this statement had an uneven effect on how philosophers. As a result, researchers during Kant’s era were inclined to see the comparative status of the association of physics to chemistry. Kant’s early statements contributed to the negligence of chemistry as a “proper science,” which further prevented the inclusion of philosophy (Brakel, 2006, p.A more recent study by Brakel employs quantitative data regarding the philosophy of chemistry in relation to other sciences (Brakel, 2014, p. This research work is more explicit in the sense that Brakel outlines findings acquired from the exploration of the main components of physical chemistry, chemical physics, the science of substances, geology, and molecular biology. According to Brakel, each of these fields annexes the philosophy of chemistry. The period of the neglect of chemistry in the philosophy of science is still ongoing (Brakel, 2014, p. This age will persist before a significant number of studies in the philosophy of chemistry routinely appear in the outlines of the overall philosophy of science.In 2006, Eric R. Scerri explored the role of chemistry in describing science from a philosophical standpoint. In this paper, Scerri wrote that logical positivism used to be the only normative strategy to the philosophy of science (Scerri, 2006, p. Normative strategy is a more respectable representation of the philosophy of science. As a result, confidence in the review of the rational structure of scientific hypotheses and the strategy entailing a “first philosophy” has diminished. From this perspective, Scerri says as long as philosophers examine concepts concrete sciences such as psychology, biology, and physics, it is only right to consider an in-depth, philosophical look at chemistry (Scerri, 2006, p.During the same year, researcher Johannes Hunger uses the failure of classical models towards chemistry over the past few decades. Hunger says the culture of turning a phenomenon into a concept before explaining it is the main reason chemistry has not had a philosophical view as a science (Hunger, 2006, p. This culture amongst researchers and scholars is commanding despite chemistry being a discipline older than a millennium. Hunger uses the arguments of preceding philosophers like
Bhushan, N and Rosenfeld, S 2000, Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry, Oxford University Press, London.
Brakel, JV 2006, ‘Kant’s Legacy for the Philosophy of Chemistry,’ Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 242, pp. 69-91.
Brakel, JV 2014, ‘Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry,’ HYLE-International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, Vol. 20, pp. 11-57.
Harré, R 2014, ‘New Tools for Philosophy of Chemistry,’ HYLE-International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, Vol. 20, pp. 77-91.
Hendry, RF 2006, ‘Is There Downward Causation in Chemistry?’ Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 242, pp. 173-89.
Hoffmann, R 2007, ‘What Might Philosophy of Science Look like If Chemists Built It?’ Topics in the Philosophy of Chemistry, Vol. 155, No. 3, pp. 321-336.
Hunger, J 2006, ‘How Classical Models of Explanation Fail to Cope with Chemistry,’ Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 242, pp. 129-56.
ISPC 2011, Home, International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry, viewed 9 January 2015, https://sites.google.com/site/socphilchem/
Needham, P 2006, ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Chemical Reaction and Chemical Substances,’ Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 1-31.
Scerri, ER 2006, ‘Normative and Descriptive Philosophy of Science and the Role of Chemistry,’ Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 242, pp 119-28.
Schummer, J 2010, ‘The Philosophy of Chemistry,’ Philosophies of the Sciences, pp. 163-83.
Weisberg, M 2003, ‘Water is Not H2O,’ Waterfinal Tex, vol. 12, no. 58, pp.1-11.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples