Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Contribution of Population-Pharmacokinetics to Drug Development Essay Example

Show related essays

Contribution of Population-Pharmacokinetics to Drug Development

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Read full text

Contribution of Population-Pharmacokinetics to Drug Development. Meanwhile, Hsieh and Korfmacher (2006) noted that where intensive blood sampling is possible, there is the benefit of replicating the outcomes with particular blood samples for a larger population size. This means that where intensive blood sampling is not possible an alternative is needed to ensure that almost all populations are catered for. Typical situations in drug development where intensive blood sampling has not been attainable include drug development processes for children, cancer and AIDS patients (Baaske, Wienken, Reineck, Duhr and Braun, 2010). There is a typical example with a study by the US Food and Drug Administration for AIDS patients where instead of using intensive blood sampling in the drug development process, pharmacokinetic screening was rather employed at phase II and phase III of the study (Greenberg, 2000).

In a similar study by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in UK where the target population was cancer patients, using pharmacokinetic screening did not only proof useful in attaining important clinical information but also was seen to be a generally cost-effective approach to get such information pertaining to both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability in treated patients (Ruiz-Garcia, Bermejo, Moss and Casabo, 2008). One other major contribution of population pk to drug development is the ability to base on outcomes with population pk studies to customize pharmacotherapy. In a study by Raymond and Brasseur (2005), it was found that there are several factors that make this outcome with customized pharmacology possible. In the first place, population pk requires that multiple samples from one person are not used. In effect, variability in drug concentrations is achieved for very specific patient populations (Bonate, 2005). This way, it is possible to assign differences in pharmacokinetics to specific patient characteristics and hence customization of pharmacotherapy. In the second instance, it is seen that when population pk is used, it is possible to emphasize on subgroups of populations. . Contribution of Population-Pharmacokinetics to Drug Development.

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Open full text


Baaske P, Wienken CJ, Reineck P, Duhr S and Braun D (2010). "Optical Thermophoresis quantifies Buffer dependence of Aptamer Binding". Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 49 No. 12, pp. 1–5.

Bartelink I.H., Rademaker C.M., Schobben A.F., et al. (2006). Guidelines on paediatric dosing on the basis of developmental physiology and pharmacokinetic considerations. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Vol. 45 No. 11, pp. 1077–1097.

Bonate P.L. (2005). "Recommended reading in population pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamics". The AAPS Journal, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 363–73.

Ernest T.B., Elder D.P., Martini LG, et al. (2007). Developing paediatric medicines: identifying the needs and recognizing the challenges. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, Vol. 59 No. 8:1043–1055.

Greenberg M. D. (2000). AIDS, experimental drug approval, and the FDA new drug screening process. Legislation and public policy, vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 295-303

Hsieh Y. and Korfmacher W.A. (2006). "Increasing speed and throughput when using HPLC-MS/MS systems for drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic screening". Current Drug Metabolism Vol. 7 No. 5, pp. 479–89.

Jagdale S.C., Patil S.A., Kuchekar B.S. and Chabukswar (2011). Preparation and Characterization of Metformin Hydrochloride — Compritol 888 ATO Solid Dispersion. Journal of Young Pharmacists. Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 197–204

Jager T., Albert C., Preuss T.G. and Ashauer R. (2011). "General unified threshold model of survival--a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology". Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45 No. 7, pp. 2529–40.

Leeder J.S. (2004). Translating pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics into drug development for clinical pediatrics and beyond. Drug Discovery Today. Vol. 9 No. 13, pp. 567–573.

Raymond A. and Brasseur D. (2005). Development of medicines for children in Europe: ethical implications. Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 45–51.

Roosmarijn F. W. et al. (2011). The role of population PK–PD modelling in paediatric clinical research. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 67, pp. 5-16.

Ruiz-Garcia A., Bermejo M., Moss A. and Casabo V.G. (2008). "Pharmacokinetics in drug discovery". Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 97 No. 2, pp. 654–90.

Samara E. and Granneman R. (1997). Role of population pharmacokinetics in drug development. A pharmaceutical industry perspective. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 294-312

Tucker G.T. (2012). "Research priorities in pharmacokinetics". British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 73 No. 6, pp. 924–6.

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Medical science, Nursing, Health Sciences & Medicine
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Medical science, Health Sciences & Medicine, Nursing
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Contribution of Population-Pharmacokinetics to Drug Development
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us