In case of John Doe v. Hly See, te plaintiff could not prove injury a feature that rendered the case baseless. Sxual molestation is a broad subject that includes several portrayal of sexual aggression towards individuals (Durchslag 65). Te offenses can involve such passive gestures as an appropriate touch and such serious claims of rape among many others. I either case, te plaintiff must always prove injury in order to hold the defendant liable for the same. I the case, Jhn Doe accuses the Holy See of sodomizing him 81).
Te case is malicious and seeks to discredit the Catholic Church. Sch constitutes a serious claim that requires effective investigation and the plaintiff should prove as much evidence and witnesses as proof of injury in order to gain justice. I the case, Jhn Doe fails to prove any form of injury a feature that makes his case hilarious ad out rightly malicious. Te catholic clergy have a desperate setting around them and are always vulnerable to accuses of sexual molestations. Te fact that they lead solitary lives and always alone with young children makes them vulnerable for sexual abuses among many other types of crime.
Hwever, sme cases have often proven the clergy guilty of the same offenses thereby gained justice as the Catholic Church acted on such cases by revoking the status of such clergy. Aditionally, te laws of the specific countries ensure that such clergies are held legally accountable in a bid to provide justice to the plaintiffs who prove injury. Te impartiality of the American legal system determined that the plaintiff in the case John Doe v.
Hly See had built his case on speculation and had difficulty proving any type of injury. Tis was not only damning but also equally damaging to the reputation of the Holy Roman Catholic. Te case of Father Andrew Ronan made him even more vulnerable; te Father had a history of sexual abuse especially when he comes to the United States from Ireland where he had admitted a similar offense. Hs situation therefore makes him vulnerable in the state where John Doe seeks to gain similar financial by discrediting the Father based on his past.
Jdges often examine the motives of both parties in a legal tussle before passing a judgment. Te rejection of the case therefore portrays the court’s determination of the plaintiff’s ill motives as he sought to discredit the Father and in his attempt to do so decided to include the...
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples