Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Midwestern Contemporary Art Case Essay Example

Show related essays

Midwestern Contemporary Art Case

This is a preview of the 11-page document
Read full text

Midwestern Contemporary Art Case. In these regards, Peter Smith has micromanaged Schmidt to deter his job and the ultimate progress of the MCA.The two individuals – Peter Smith and Keith Schmidt – are experiencing a challenging conflict that goes deeper than the simple question of whether Schmidt is acting recklessly in his expansion plans or not. Its indicated that during the time when the two men were working together, from Schmidts 1989 hiring, there were contentious issues that were raised between the two men. For instance, its stated that, “These confrontations were rooted in a number of areas: what artifacts to show, what artist to invite to forums, and when to hold exhibitions. However, the most heated arguments occurred over the direction and speed of the MCAs expansion” (pg.

In these regards, its clear that while the overarching conflict regards Peter Smiths conservative nature, the conflict goes beyond this to indicate that the two men have a deep and underlining difference in personal philosophy. While these are the specific reasons for the conflict, from a managerial and organizational perspective, the conflict the men are experiencing is related to their individual role within the organization. As board chairman Peter Smith believes that it is his role to ensure the safe and sound direction of the art center; conversely, Keith Schmidt understands that as executive director he was hired to oversee and ensure the expansion of the art center from its current state to that of a nationally recognized center along the lines of the previous projects that he has overseen. While the individuals have a conflict of personal philosophy, there also exists a conflict regarding their roles within the organization. It follows then that the ultimate conflict that the two men are experiencing relates to their power and decision making ability within the MCA. As an area of contention, its clear that their individual roles need to be more accurately defined within the organization to deter future conflict. While the definition of board member and executive director generally contains the understanding that the board member will not interfere in the day to day operations of the executive director, its clear that to an extent Peter Smith has assumed greater responsibility than his job definition has allowed, and as a result the organizational conflict has arisen between. Midwestern Contemporary Art Case.

This is a preview of the 11-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Visual Arts & Film Studies, Professional, Architecture
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Visual Arts & Film Studies, Design & Technology, Performing Arts
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Midwestern Contemporary Art Case
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us