An analysis of the underlying lexicogrammatical signatures within linguistic corpora(Gilquin et al, 2007: 322) is facilitated through error tagging systems. One example of an error tagging system that is devised by Nicholls (2003; cited in Granger, 2007:256) is a three-tier system specifying the error domain (the form, grammar, lexis, etc), the category of the error (for instance, whether tense, gender or number) and the word category (adjective, noun, verb, etc), which offers tremendous potential in teaching of English as a foreign language.One of the findings that have emerged from learner corpora is that some linguistic features are common to learners from all foreign language groups, which may be developmental, while some appear characteristic of particular linguistic groups. Riney and Takagi (1999), have highlighted the results of various studies that have examined the correlation between in Japanese EFL speakers. One of the findings was that VOT did not change over time in Japanese speakers of English, suggesting that there may be the phonological similarity between Japanese and English diaphones. Linguistic Analysis.
Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton, 2007. “Discourse on the Move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure”, Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 28.
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy, 2006. “Cambridge Grammar of English: A comprehensive guide: Spoken and Written English: Grammar and Usage,” Cambridge
Duranti. 1998. "Communicative Competence." Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (edn. J. Mey), Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Gilquin, Gaetanelle, Granger, Sylviane and Paquot, Magali, 2007. “Learner corpora: the missing link in EAP pedagogy”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6:319-335.
Granger, Sylvanie, 2007. “Integrating learner corpora and natural language processing: A crucial step towards reconciling techological sophistication and pedagogical effectiveness”, ReCall, 19(3): 252-268.
Gumperz. John J. 1996. On teaching language in its sociocultural context. In Social Interaction, Social Context and Language. Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, D.I. Slobin et al. (eds), 469-480. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Karin, Aijmer 2009. Corpora and Language Teaching, University of Gothenburg, Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33, viii, 232 pp. John Benjamins Publishing Company
Lerner, G. H, 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences in Progress”, Language In Society, 20, 441-458.
Liu, Dilin and Jiang, Ping, 2009. “Using a corpus based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL contexts”, The Modern Language Journal, 93(i) 61-79
McCarthy, M and Carter, R, 2001. “Ten criteria for a spoken grammar”, In Hinkel, E and Foots, S, 2001. “New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms”, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Meunier F, 2007. “Reprint of The pedagogical value of native and learner corpora in EFL grammar teaching”(2002). IN Teubert W. and R. Krishnamurthy (eds) Corpus Linguistics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Volume 2. London and New York:, Routledge. 119-141
Oya, Taeko, Manalo, Emmanuel and Greenwood, Jackie, 2004. “The influence of personality and anxiety on the oral performance of Japanese speakers of English”, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18: 841-855.
Riney, Timothy J, 1999. “Global foreign accent and voice onset time among Japanese EFL speakers”, Language Learning, 49(2): 275-302
Saville-Troike, M. (1989). The ethnography of communication: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Basil Blackwell
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples