Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

CDP Evaluation for the University of Melbourne Essay Example

Show related essays

CDP Evaluation for the University of Melbourne

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Read full text

CDP Evaluation for the University of Melbourne. The University Library has created its specific collection development process for this purpose (UniMelb, 2012c). The has stated that a CDP must be constructed on the basis of multiple criteria. However, the complex evaluative networks of multiple criteria can be simplified in the form of four key factors. The main question to be asked by the library management in this context is: Who are our users? The University of Melbourne is a huge academic organization of scholars and experts who may come from highly disparate academic backgrounds. The University Library’s CDP is therefore aimed to cater with a “strong collaboration between Library staff, academics, students and faculty or graduate school Library committees”

(UniMelb, 2012b). However, a stricter analysis reveals that professionals and technicians have not been mentioned as distinct partakers in the process of academic collaboration. Industry oriented utilization of the University Library thus appears to be limited. According to the scholars like Joint (2009), conventional libraries need infrastructure involving real estate, library management software, etc. However, according to the experts like Joint (2009), Sreekumar and Sunitha (2005), etc., digital libraries need only virtual cyberspace and it can act as a powerful subsystem of a large conventional library (see Appendix – 1 for more information). University Library’s CDP contains dedicated portions that are fully aimed at addressing issues regarding the acquisition of different digital resources under a special section of “electronic collection policy” (UniMelb 2012d). NLA (2013, paragraph 1) to considers electronic collections as one of the most “significant items” to be acquired; and University Library’s CDP is based on a similar approach. However, University Library’s policy has a limitation: It does not explicitly state its own digital content preservation policy, which is an important policy area as seen in the CDP of the NLA. CDP Evaluation for the University of Melbourne.

This is a preview of the 4-page document
Open full text


American Library Association (2007). Statement on principles and standards of acquisition

practices. Chicago: Author.

Anderson, R. (2011). Collections 2021: The future of the library collection is not a collection.

Serials, 24(3), 211-215.

Beisler, A., & Kurt, L. (2012). E-book workflow: From inquiry to access. Collaborative

Leadership, 4(3)

Crawford, W. (2007). Finding a balance. Cites & Insights, 7(1), 1-24

Joint, N. (2009). Choosing between print or digital collection building in times of financial

constraint. Library Review, 58(4), 264-271.

Mayo Clinic (2007). Information Systems. Retrieved on 18th August 2013 from


Morrisey, L. J. (2008). Ethical issues in collection development. Journal of Library

Administration, 47(3-4), 163-171.

NLA (2013). Recent Acquisitions Highlights. Retrieved on 21st August

2013 from http://www.nla.gov.au/what-we-collect/recent-acquisitions-highlights

NLA (2010a). Guidelines for the Preparation of a collection

development policy. Canberra: Author.

NLA (2010b). Legal Deposit requirements Australia wide. Retrieved on

17th August 2013 from http://www.nla.gov.au/legal-deposit/requirements-australia-wide

NLA (2009). Preservation Policy. Retrieved on 21st August 2013 from


Sreekumar, M. G., & Sunitha, T. (2005). Library capacity building through e-journal consortia:

The Indian perspective. The International Information & Library Review, 41(1).

UniMelb (2012a). The University of Melbourne. Retrieved on 17th August from


UniMelb (2012b). Collection development policy overview. Retrieved on 17th August from


UniMelb (2012c). Collection development process. Retrieved on 17th August from


UniMelb (2012d). Electronic collection policy. Retrieved on 17th August from


UniMelb (2012e). Collection review policy and guidelines. Retrieved on 17th August from


Appendix – 1

In the context of digital library, e-journals (Sreekumar & Sunitha 2005) and e-books (Beisler & Kurt, 2012) do deserve special mention as academic collectibles. Contextually, the University Library’s CDP has dedicated portions fully aimed at addressing varieties of different digital content under the special section of “electronic collection policy” (UniMelb, 2012d).

However, for a deeper understanding of how a synchronised library system works in both conventional and virtual library frameworks, Mayo Clinic’s (2007) diagram for integrated library systems can be referred to from a conceptual perspective (see Figure – 1).

Figure – 1: A conceptual view of an integrated library system where both conventional and electronic libraries are operational. (Mayo Clinic 2007)

Appendix – 2

According to Victoria’s legislation, a library can expect a steady supply of different publications as per the state’s policy of legal deposit (NLA 2010b). A screenshot depicting legal deposit policy as stated in the NLA website is given in figure – 2.

Figure – 2: Screenshot showing how the NLA interprets Victoria’s legislation with regard to CDP issues and whom to contact in the case of confusion, dispute, or other problems. Source: NLA (2010b)

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Management, Marketing, Finance & Accounting
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Management, Human Resources, Macro & Microeconomics
Hire a Writer
preview essay on CDP Evaluation for the University of Melbourne
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us