This will be done while keeping in mind the laws of the country or state in determining the enforceability of the agreement. For example, a court may be approached to rule on whether it is appropriate or not to carry out an arbitration process in a bid to protect consumers from an abusive arbitration process. This is known as unconscionability as in the case of Iberia Credit Bureau V Cingular wireless (2004) where an arbitration clause was invalidated, (Sealey, L.Litigation process allows for lack of confidentiality of highly sensitive information as opposed to the arbitration process, which uphold confidentiality. This is especially so if national oil companies are on trial. The companies may lawfully obtain confidential information, which will give them a tactical advantage that enables them to win cases (Beckerman, J. Sometimes this information though very sensitive to national security is not very relevant to the case. This is not so in the arbitration process whereby the parties involved are only allowed to produce documents that are bound to influence the decision of the court thus inhibiting the ability of the plaintiff to be at a better position due to the tactical advantage that they may gain.The litigation process is quite inflexible compared to arbitration. This is because the judges presiding over the cases are usually not experts in the OG industry. Although they are allowed to call upon the use of specialists in the relevant fields to resolve or dispute evidence, they generally only use then if particular substantive evidence is needed. By using arbitration however, parties are allowed to appoint a neutral party to review the documents if the arbitration panel believes reviewing the documents themselves is inappropriate (Wesley, J. This allows for the panel to select an expert who is qualified to rule over the matter.The litigation process is seen to be more politically charged compared to the arbitration process. A standoff point is often created when national oil companies insist that they wish to be tried in their own country while private oil entities prefer an environment that seems less politically charged. The foreign investors may resolve to seek protection of foreign judicial reforms in order to mitigate a situation that they think is biased towards the national oil companies that are being tried in their home countries (Mouwad, J.Other than litigation and arbitration, there are other methods of conflict
Beckerman, J., 2000. Confronting Civil Discoveries Fatal Flaws. The Law Review, 505, pp. 523-526.
Hannigan, B., 2012. Company Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heath, W. J., 2006. Argument for considering Arbitration as a tool for managing Discovery problems in International OG Controversies. OG Journal, December 2006.
Marie, A. N., 2009. International and Comparative Mediation, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Marks, S. B., 1990. Alternative Dispute Resolution in OG Industry. OG Law and Taxing Review, 41, pp.9-41.
Mouawad, J., 2006. As Profits Surge oil Giants Find Hurdles Abroad. The New York Times, 6th May.
Neil, M., 2005. Courts Differ in Enforceability of Mandatory Clauses. ABA Journal, January 2005 issue.
Rivkin, D. W., 2004. The new rules of Evidence in International Arbitration. ALI-ABA, sk 063, pp.751-753.
Sealey, S. L., 2007. Cases and Materials in Company Law, Washington: Oxford University press.
Vossestein, G. J., 2010 C. Modernization of European company law and Corporate Governance. Bedforshire, UK: Turpin Distribution services.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples