Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Law of Contract - The Advertisement for the Pet Toys Essay Example

Show related essays

Law of Contract - The Advertisement for the Pet Toys

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Read full text

Law of Contract - The Advertisement for the Pet Toys. I believe that, since the advertisement did not include any words that would oblige the advertiser to sell to everybody who has read it (unlike the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 QB 256, where the advertisers included in the advertisement the binding obligation to pay anyone £100 under certain conditions and therefore, the advertisement was considered an offer), it must be regarded as an invitation to treat, which is not binding whatsoever. In addition, according to the case of Harvey v Facey [1893] AC 552
a statement of the minimum price at which a party may be willing to sell will not amount to an offer.
Considering the above facts, James’s letter should not be regarded as an acceptance, but as an offer.

He offered to negotiate as a response to the invitation to treat. In spite of James’ believing otherwise, that is that he is accepting an offer, and not actually offering something, his letter is to be regarded as an offer, because an invitation to treat may not be accepted, it may be negotiated by an offer coming from the respondent to the invitation to treat. According to Halsbury (2007) "An invitation to treat is a mere declaration of willingness to enter into negotiations; it is not an offer, and cannot be accepted so as to form a binding contract." Through his letter, James made an offer to the store, by which he offered to buy 10 pet toys at the total price of $50, which is the minimum stated in the advertisement: $5 per item.
The response of the shop manager– Mary – through which she indicates that James will need to provide an additional payment to purchase the toys is to be regarded as a counter offer. According to article 19 of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Good states that “A reply to an offer which purports to be an acceptance but contains additions, limitations or other modifications is a rejection of the offer and constitutes a counter-offer.” . Law of Contract - The Advertisement for the Pet Toys.

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Open full text

References

:

1. Andrew Burrows. (2007). Casebook on Contract. UK: Hart Publishing

2. Clashfern, Lord Mackay, Halsburys Laws of England (London: LexisNexis-Butterworths, 2007)

3. Janet Whittle (1997). Canada Business: The portable encyclopedia for doing business in Canada. USA: World Trade Press

4. Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204

5. Richards, Paul (2007). Law of Contract.8th Edition. England. Edinburgh Gate.

6. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Good, article 19

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Media, Politics, Science
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Media, History, Culture
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Law of Contract - The Advertisement for the Pet Toys
  • Pages: 6 (1500 words)
  • Document Type: Assignment
  • Subject: Media
  • Level: High School
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us