and show the whole world the real picture of the Kurdish situation back then and today.The documentary “The Kurdish Winter” is considerably long, as it runs for approximately one hour. The film mainly involves various Kurdish victims of the Kurdish genocide. These through narrations, tell their stories of what happened then. They also share knowledge on the various challenges they continue to face today in the world as Kurdish people. As highlighted, this documentary aims at revealing the truth to the world about the Kurdish situation. This therefore, adopted the enlightenment theory of truth, as a major way or technique through which documentary could present its truth. In this case, this documentary aims at ensuring that after watching, the audience are able to think critically. The audience will therefore, be better placed to comprehend how the real Kurdish situation is, and apart from the notion provided by the mainstream media (Mustafa 65).Screening this documentary was one of the most important exercises I was involved in. I considered this as an opportunity to judge the feedback of the public, basing on the reactions of the audience present at the time of screening the documentary. This would therefore, give me a clue on the level of impact the documentary will make after receiving a wider audience from different parts of the world.When screening a documentary, there are different challenges that one should expect; however, this depends on the nature of the documentary to be screened (United to End Genocide n. In my case, I although I was keen enough to follow the right procedures of screening a documentary, this did not shield me from various challenges that I experienced during the process. Nonetheless,. The Kurdish winter.
Gunter, M. M. 1994. The changing Kurdish problem in Turkey. London: Research Institute for the Study of Conflict and Terrorism, 54-55.
Gendercide n.d, “Case Study: The Anfal Campaign (Iraqi Kurdistan), 1988,” Accessed 7
April 2014 < http://www.gendercide.org/case_anfal.html>, 35-42.
Ibrahim, F. & Gurbey, G 2000, “The Kurdish Conflict in Turkey: Obstacles and Chances for
Peace and Democracy,” New York, LIT Verlag Munster, 17-35.
Karlin, B. & Johnson, J 2011, “Measuring Impact: The Importance of Evaluation for
Documentary Film Campaigns,” M/C Journal, 14 (6), 14-28.
Kirişci, K., & Winrow, G. M. 1997. The Kurdish question and Turkey: an example of a trans-state ethnic conflict. London: Frank Cass, 45-60.
Marfo, A. 2007. The Evolution and Impact of Documentary Films. Senior Honors Projects.159-165.
Mustafa, G. M. 2013. When mountains weep: coming of age in Kurdistan. Lexington, KY: [CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform], 64-65.
Routt, W 1991, “The truth of the documentary” The Australian Journal of Media & Culture
Vol. 5, No 1, 16-18.
Spence, L., & Navarro, V. (2011). Crafting truth: Documentary form and meaning. New
Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press, 123(6), 67-69.
Torchin, L 2012, “Creating the Witness: Documenting Genocide on Film, Video, and the
Internet (Visible Evidence),” University of Minnesota Press, New York, 243(3), 35-45.
United to End Genocide n.d, “How to Host a Movie Screening,” Accessed 7 April 2014
< http://endgenocide.org/take-action/activist-resources/how-to-host-a-movie-screening/>, 2-3.
Unsafe haven: Iranian Kurdish refugees in Iraqi Kurdistan.. 2000. New York, N.Y.: Iranian Refugees Alliance, Inc. 45-67.
Walley, J 2010, “Lessons of Documentary: Reality, Representation, and Cinematic
Expressivity,” Accessed 7 April, 2014 < http://www.aesthetics-online.org/articles/index.php?articles_id=51>, 1-4.
Wilson, K., Crowder-Taraborrelli, T 2012, “Film and Genocide,” University of Wisconsin
Press, New York, 113-156.
Yildiz, K. 2005. The Kurds in Turkey EU accession and human rights. London: Pluto Press in association with Kurdish Human Rights Project, 45-56.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples