The benefit of this approach is that it is possible for Mr. Mller to evaluate those results that are comparable, ad adopt a system that can allow him to establish those decisions that would yield great benefits to the stakeholders. Cnversely, te major weakness that is associated with approach is that it involves future prediction. Tough there are some people who can be able to adopt this form of life experience, oe cannot be certain that it will work. Tis would result to unexpected results that may not be Terefore, te choice that he makes may not yield great benefits to most of the stakeholders (Childers, 2007).
I the case of mixed consequential, M. Mller may combine deontology thinking with consequential thinking in order to come up with a single approach that would result to ethical decision making. B assuming the issue of justice, te decision would be deontological, ad consequentialism in case the good or service facilitates for utility. Mller should use this option in case he assumes that a particular activity that he engages in would to justice and satisfaction (Childers, 2007).
Wth regard to deontological approach, te consequences that Mr. Mller would face for the actions that he embarks on are attributed to evaluating between what is right or wrong. I this perspective, te most vital aspect that he should remember is that the consequences do not lead to differences when determining whether the activities that he engages in his relationship with the stakeholders are moral or immoral. Te standard that is associated with morality determines if the activity is appropriate, ad whether the are good (Childers, 2007).
I this case, i is appropriate for Mr. Mller to ensure that he keeps moral standards regardless of the consequences. I case Mr. Mller is deontological, h should combine obligations and responsibilities while determining if the decisions that he makes are ethical. H should always keep his promises and follow legal proceedings. Wen the stakeholders follow the law, ten the end result is that they can be able to produce decisions in a consistent manner. Tis is because the decisions that they make would be on various responsibilities.
Wth regard to deontology, M. Mller would realize that it has various positive features as well as weaknesses. Oe of the major weakness that is associated with this...
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples