In other words, some boosters just want more say for their money. Some areas towards which boosters donate their money include athletic facilities, college stadiums, libraries and class buildings. In return, colleges usually dedicate these buildings in the boosters’ names (McKay, 2006).Dienhart asserts that boosters often get the ball rolling. To him, a coach can establish a good program and qualify all the athletes he wants. However, if the boosters dislike the program’s direction, the boosters will make the director of athletics know it – when they are not satisfied; they back off supporting the program. He gives an example of the firing of Chan Gailey at Georgia Tech where Dan Radakovich, the director of athletics said the resolution was just about business as losses and wins. Although in every of Gaileys six seasons Tech made bowls, no longer were the boosters behind him making funds raising became challenging. He adds that any good athletic director already has anticipated his next move and has a list of coaching candidates in such a way that before firing a coach, he already has another coach who is ready for the job or has a number of options about which he is happy.Depending on the school type, the athletic director may involve influential boosters in the search or may conduct the search himself at smaller programs. However, almost all athletic directors use a search firm or recruiters owing to the fact that most of them are not well connected and are not acquainted with other coaches. Others use search firms to stay out of the news. On getting a job, the coach is advised to build. Impact of Boosters on Collegiate Athletics.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples