There are people, epecially philosophers, wo have responded against the degree of haphazardness of conservative moralities through searching for the standard of right and wrong. Tey may view the solution as obedience of God’s commandments or else favor a secular criterion like the principle of utility. Sme of these tactics provide for numerous broadly accepted ethical beliefs, alevel of amalgamating explanation, hwever, srictly adopted, te self-evident tactic can lead to a Martian morality through clashes with various deep human responses. I is shocking that if obeying God results Abraham agreeing to sacrifice Isaac his son while secular principle concerning impartiality results parents having limited places in the lifeboat to state to his or her children that they are required to take their turn in the queue.
Te toughest issue as far as ethics are concerned is usually concerned with identifying a middle ground between indiscriminating approvals of intuitive reactions and deserting all the emotionally rooted human values in regards to some abstract principle. I some instances, pople are emotionally attracted to doing things that go against the rules, wether by unreflective conservative ethics or through some hypothetical reconstruction.
Wen considered from the rules point of view, tis is a weakness that has to be eliminated, hwever, sme of these weaknesses are components of the humanity that a huge majority can appreciate from the inside with the resulting empathy becoming a component of the humanity of an individual. Fiedrich Nietzsche, a evil-skeptic of the nineteenth century supports the argument that the concept of evil is supposed to be abandoned since it is harmful. Hwever, hs motives for that the concept of evil is dangerous differ from those of other people associated with this topic.
I Nietzsche’s view, te concept of evil is harmful since it negatively affects the potential of human beings as well as their vitality through promotion of the weak in sprit while subduing the strong. I Kant’s view, hmans have a moral good will only when they decide to perform actions that are ethically correct because they are themselves morally correct (Hill 42). Fom his perspective, ay human being who does not have moral goodwill possesses an evil will with three grades of evil existing and can be seen as gradually more evil stages where the will is corrupted.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples