Objective humanitarian necessity, bsed on the degree of human rights violation, i never the standard considered in deciding whether or not the international community will respond or intervene (Kassner, 2013). Iternational politics is controlled by money and power, mderated, t a certain extent, b the humanitarian desire, wich is affected by public opinion and the media (Talentino, 2005). Hmanitarian intervention is the exercise of military force in another state’s territory to give humanitarian support to the people of that country. Uually, te necessity of humanitarian support is brought the existence of several human rights violations.
Hmanitarian intervention is a process of implementing human rights and is generally rationalised on such bases (Krieg, 2012). Te universal nature of human rights offers the foundation of such rationale. Te defence of intervention through reference to universal human rights creates several issues. Te usual theoretical basis for defending the international community’s exercise of military violence is ‘just war theory’, ad this is derived from the primacy of national sovereignty. Hwever, hmanitarian intervention frequently disrupts national sovereignty (Kassner, 2013). I is a the area of just war theory regarding how violence or force could be exercised—jus in bello (the law in waging war)—is aware of human rights, a shown, fr instance, i the code of discrimination.
Hwever, te just war principles of jus ad bellum (right to war), wich refer to the exercise of military force across territories largely consider national defence as an important requirement for such reasoning (Carlsnaes, Rsse & Simmons, 2012). Frce can reasonably be exercised only in reaction to hostility by another state. O the contrary, violations human rights that validate humanitarian intervention take place within a state.
I is the state which perpetrates hostility against its own people but not against another state (Carlsnaes et al. Sch conflict between humanitarian intervention and national sovereignty underlines a core dilemma with just war theory that was already obvious in the past. Te theory must concern the attainment of justice and, oherwise, mst not be pursued. Jstice involves protection of human rights (Hehir, 2013). Cnventional principles of jus ad bellum, wich. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples