Anybody and everybody in the present scenario feels free to download and use anything that is on the World Wide Web. In the earlier researches, researches have found out that the legislation of most of the countries is not able to protect the works of photographers from illegal publishing online, the main reason being that the legislation is too old and does not incorporate the new technological issues.The study will, therefore, elaborate the copyright law on infringement in different countries and the loopholes attached with it. The different types of infringements will be discussed in the paper. For instance, Primary infringement stands for ‘the copying of a work, making available to the public and adaptation of it’ and secondary infringement involves ‘dealings with infringing copies through acts of importation, sale, or other distribution’ (Christie et al, 2008).Moreover, another fact which may be considered is that the Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988 considers various types of material as the objects of potential infringement. But it doesn’t consider the rights of photographers on their works. This is mainly due to the fact that the legislation of most of the countries concerning copyright law is old enough to have the illegal publishing of photos on the Internet examined in there. Moreover, the legal acts of some countries do not include the section about photography as an entertainment product at all.The question whether all kinds of photography (documentary, commercial or artistic) qualify for copyright protection was asked by Baade (1997). The author brings the example from Time, Inc. Bernard Geis (1968), a case during which the. How Can the Photographers Prevent Illegal Publishing of Their Phostos In the Internet.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples