Other costs also include research and development, which at present is the most critical item being propagated by governments. Moreover, the government needs to incur indirect costs such as building of infrastructures to ensure that transportation and communication improves healthcare delivery. Furthermore, the marginal cost of health care needs to be evaluated. Unlike the total cost, which is simply an aggregate, marginal cost accounts the movement in the cost. It is more important to monitor the effect of population increase in total healthcare than measuring the total cost alone.Health Economics can be approached scientifically using tools and mechanisms. Analytic evaluation of cost management in Health Economics serves as the primary point of these discussions. First, the cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) economic compares a particular health care product or service. The goal of the method is to find the least costly option among a pool of choices (Donaldson and Shackley, 1997). It has to be noted that the alternative chosen needs to demonstrate an effect that is substantially similar to the other choices provided.There are several conditions in this analysis that have to be verified before arriving as conclusive findings. The initial comparison will use price as the gauge. Indeed, it is easy to identify which among the alternatives is the most economic. Another important consideration in this analysis is the negative effects provided by a medicines being compared. It is important to emphasize on the level of toxicity and the option being considered needs to be as low-risk as the other medicines. Lastly, the effectiveness of the medicine being prioritised has to within the level of the other medicine it is being compared with.Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) necessitates programme results to be valued monetarily (Nas, 1996). This allows analysts the incremental cost including the incremental units as health programmes are being implemented. CBA compares the discounted future inflow of aggregate programme benefits with incremental programme losses. Basically, the goal of the analysis is to determine the excess of benefits when equated with the losses. Positive net return means that benefits exceeded the cost and the programme is described as worthwhile.CBA has always been a primary tool used by governments in evaluating projects
Arrow, P. (2000). Community Dental Health. “Cost minimisation of two occlusal caries
preventive programmes,” pp. 85-91.
Culyer, A.J. (1989). Compendium of English Language Course Syllabi of Textbooks in
Health Economics. “A glossary of common terms encountered in health economics.
Donaldson, C. and Shackley, P. (1987). Oxford Textbook for Public Health. “Economic
evaluation.” Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 949-971.
Drummond, M.F. et al. (2006). Studies in Economic Appraisal in Health Care. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp. 103-105.
Fuchs, V. (1996). The American Economic Review. “Economics, values, and health
reform.” Pages 1-24.
Gerard, K. (1992). Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, pp. 249-279.
Harrington, W. and Portney, P. (1987). Journal of Urban Economics. “Valuing the
benefits of health and safety regulations,” pp. 101-112.
Luce, B. and Elixhauser, A. (1990). Standards in Socioeconomic Evaluation of
Healthcare Products and Services. Berlin: Springer.
Nas, T.F. (1996). Cost-Benefits Analysis: Theory and Application. Thousand Oaks,
California: Sage Publications.
Neumann, P.J. (2005). Using Cost-effective analysis in Health Care. Oxford: Oxford
Nichol, K. (2001). Arch Internal Medicine. “Cost-benefit analysis of a strategy to
vaccinate healthy working adults against influenza,” pp. 749-759.
Saltelli, A. (2004). Sensitivity Analysis in Practice. A Guide to Assessing Scientific
Models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Tucker, A.W. et al. (1998). JAMA. “Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rotavirus
immunization program for the United States,” pp. 1371-1376.
Valenstein, M. et al. (2001). The Cost Utility of Screening for Depression in Primary
Care. pp. 345-360.
Williams, A. (1987). Health and Economics. “Health and Economics: The cheerful face
of dismal Science.” London: McMillan.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples