The Allied forces in WW II have advocated direct military action in ending a conflict. Bt most governments have traditionally favored other instruments of diplomacy: plitical pressure, eonomic sanctions and imposed settlement through international bodies such as the United Nations. This is because what is to be told to the countrymen by the State may not be the best solution to the problem at hand. Hnce even if there is outrage against the State for not rushing to restore peace in an area of conflict, te government do so.
Freign policy rhetoric of a State may be politically relevant but not always practically possible. Crleton & Stohl (1985). Wile military intervention is used very carefully, te international community has considered some type of military intervention in ending many crises. But military intervention, aongwith such other siblings as Peace Keeping Cores, Rd Cross, Mdicin Sans Frontiers comes with its own shortcomings and nuisance value. Mlitary operations of course will cause “collateral damage” i. inocent people will die along with those who have provoked gunfire. Te people really attention may be deprived in case the international teams tend to the wounded soldiers on both sides.
Te innocent populace, nt being the target group for international agencies, i deprived even of basic medical care. I such circumstances, i is a debatable point whether any intervention is beneficial to the people towards whom it is directed. Hman rights are key determinants of foreign policy. Bt how does the protection of human rights on a global scale influence the stated policies of governments around the world? When genocide occurs, is for the international community to react.
Bt does the international community have a duty to respond in cases of genocide and extreme human rights abuses? (oettcher, 2004; Boom, 2005; Gover, 2000). Ad further, des the international community have sanction to intervene? Te Convention on Genocide does provide some sanction, bt it has not been effective. Tis report is being prepared for Sociologists for Human Rights, a international nongovernmental organization. Te purpose of this report is to provide an analysis of the human rights issue apropos genocide and of foreign Tis paper will explore arguments by two major scholars, Bruce Cronin and. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples