This amendment also provides the parents with the rights of caring for their kids within or according to the principles of the religion they subscribe to. It implies that foregoing treatment due to religious convictions has a legal backing (Huguelet & Koenig, 2009). Interestingly, the constitution of the US stipulates that all the citizens have the right to better medical services. Thus using religious connotation and principles to hamper medical treatment leads to a situation where principles are conflicting. In addition, medical practices usually have the backing of evidence of ability to improve the conditions of an ailing person if appropriately diagnosed (Bellamy, 2014). Foregoing curative treatment has the potential danger of risking the life of the ailing individual especially those who may be in severe pain. In such a scenario, the motives of the individual advocating for religious healing can be questioned. As much as the principles of practicing principles of religion especially in providing care for children have a constitutional baking, these rights have limitations in the event that the life of a child or an individual is protected. The right to the religious practices, principles, and beliefs is not an extension to the right to put the life of the children in danger (Guinn, 2006). Religious principles and medical principles in medical treatment due to religious beliefs.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples