mostly, this delays the final verdict giving the prosecutor more time or assuring further investigation. In other situations, prosecutors might produce testimonies from their forensic experts, those that are deceitful or specious; additionally, they might improperly augment the testimonies making wiles that are incorrect, ambiguous and provocative to the jury. This is a major challenge concerning forensic evidence, but the main shortcoming is that the law allows prosecutors to consult private forensic agencies, some of which do not believe in integrity. Resultantly, a basis for the solution of this issue entails the establishment of forensic labs that link with law enforcement organizations or the judicial systems that advocate for demanding regulation measures. Moreover, the government can work hand in hand with the judicial systems and law enforcement agencies to refining edification and management of specialists that conduct the forensic tests and present the results in court. With the prosecutors exploiting forensic evidence in every possible way, the defense counsel lacks the necessary skills in evaluating the basis of the evidence and knowledge in ensuring that the wiles from it are accurate.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples