Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Prosecutors Misuse Forensic Science

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Read full text

This paper illustrates that prosecutors have the mandate of applying forensic evidence in every level of the trial processes, inclusive of disclosure before trial, presenting a witness or evidence after trial and when making their wiles to the jury. This shows that they can also misuse this evidence in their favor but by violating the rule of the constitution, state and ethics policies that dictate their general mien. Considerably, the nature of forensic evidence is the key facilitator of prosecutors misusing it to their advantage, especially because very few understand its facets due to its complexity and methodological applications.

The common cases of misuse are when the prosecutors subdue or unveil at the end of trials claiming it relevant then; mostly, this delays the final verdict giving the prosecutor more time or assuring further investigation. In other situations, prosecutors might produce testimonies from their forensic experts, those that are deceitful or specious; additionally, they might improperly augment the testimonies making wiles that are incorrect, ambiguous and provocative to the jury. This is a major challenge concerning forensic evidence, the main shortcoming is that the law allows prosecutors to consult private forensic agencies, some of which do not believe in integrity.

Resultantly, a basis for the solution of this issue entails the establishment of forensic labs that link with law enforcement organizations or the judicial systems that advocate for demanding regulation measures. Moreover, the government can work hand in hand with the judicial systems and law enforcement agencies to refining edification and management of specialists that conduct the forensic tests and present the results in court. With the exploiting forensic evidence in every possible way, the defense counsel lacks the necessary skills in evaluating the basis of the evidence and knowledge in ensuring that the wiles from it are accurate.

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Law, Social science, History
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Law, Media, Sociology
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Prosecutors Misuse Forensic Science
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us