Consequently, “There is absolutely no doubt there are situations in police operations where command and control is critical and that rank based authority is required to give directions free from dissent, equivocation, or debate” (Murray, 202, p. A senior person on the truck would definitely encounter several situations where autocratic leadership style is required. The most common of these situations are the following:1)If the senior has new and untrained followers who still do not have experience in following most procedures and performing most tasks. Police work deals with the law and with ensuring the safety of the surroundings, and it is not advisable to risk these due to the lack of guidance and inexperience of the police. In this situation, it is crucial to ensure that new and untrained individuals adhere strictly to the seniors instructions (Brower, et al.2)If the senior determines that the situation needs effective supervision through clear and specific instructions and orders. Dangerous situations usually require autocratic leadership style. Here, confusion on which instruction to follow should never happen and everyone elses initiatives cannot be accommodated (Hautala, 2005).3)If a different leadership style is deemed ineffective. This sometimes happens if the followers are not knowledgeable of the present task. If the senior decides to use the democratic, managerial, or collaborative style, chances of obtaining insightful ideas from the followers are minimal. This could also happen if animosity among the followers is present. Therefore, as Murray states, “every police force/service must have an organisational regime which recognises these situations,. Ethical Values and Leadership Styles.
Baker, T. (2000). Sergeants and police officers. Effective police leadership (pp.76-89). Flushing, NY: Looseleaf Law Publications.
Brower, H., Lester, S., Korsgaard, M., & Dineen, B. (January 01, 2009). A Closer Look at Trust Between Managers and Subordinates: Understanding the Effects of Both Trusting and Being Trusted on Subordinate Outcomes. Journal of Management, 35, 2, 327-347.
Burgess, M., Fleming, J., & Marks, M. (December 01, 2006). Thinking Critically about Police Unions in Australia: Internal Democracy and External Responsiveness. Police Practice and Research, 7, 5, 391-409.
Harvey, M., Buckley, M., Heames, J., Zinko, R., Brouer, R., & Ferris, G. (January 01, 2007). A Bully as an Archetypal Destructive Leader. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 2, 117-129.
Hautala, T. (January 01, 2005). The Effects of Subordinates Personality on Appraisals of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11, 4, 84- 92.
Murray, J. (2002). Leadership and integrity in policing: The march away from militarism presentation at the third police leadership conference. Managing change through principled leadership, April 10-12, 2002, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rabinowitz, P, Styles of leadership, in Community toolbox, B Berkowitz (ed), University of Kansas.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples