[The 7-10 English Victorian Syllabus] contains may sections that deal with cross-curricula matters and pedagogical and educational issues that are broader than the English curriculum discipline: assessment and reporting; outcomes-based education; gender issues; multicultural education .” (Dec 2010, p.Green and Cormack in their attempts to explain the wide acceptability of the English language specified that the hybrid quality of the English language that has resulted in its generosity. Empowered by the “hybridity” as specified by Green and Cormack, the English language has the capacity to satisfy an array of purposes, having multiple social, cultural and educational effects. Keeping in mind the wide acceptability and appreciation of the English language as an essential medium of communication in academic disciplines it has also become important to teach and consequently encourage students to learn the language with such effectiveness so that they can acknowledge effects of the English Language in social, cultural and educational peripheries. Green and Cormack have identified that irrespective of its development and phenomenal success as the language for communication in the global context adequate measures have not yet been taken to contextualise the language within the educational philosophy: “What has not been understood to date, or sufficiently appreciated, is the extent to which such matters can, and need to, be related to and contextualised within a more general educational history” (Oct 2008, p. Thus, in it important in this context to revaluate theoretical models, pedagogical rationales and “hybridity” of the English language so that possibilities can be explored to make students realize about the wide scope of its effects in social, cultural and educational aspects.Keeping in accord with Green and Cormack argument about “hybridity” of the English language that has resulted in the generous nature of English as a curriculum area, the initiatives taken by the Victorian educational department deserves special attention. The Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority, under the State Government of Victoria, have provided special attention in the context of teaching English Language. The first paragraph of the “Introduction to English” section elaborates upon the philosophical and procedural approaches of the department to teach the
“Benchmarks-Year 7 Benchmarks”. (2000). Available at:
http://cms.curriculum.edu.au/litbench/build.asp?pg=3. Accessed on: May 3, 2011.
Cater, N. and Whittaker, P. (2007, September 5). “Reading the riot act, ‘Opinion’. The Australian, p. 19.
Cormack, P. and Green, B. (October 2008). “Curriculum history, ‘English’ and the New
Education; or, installing the empire of English?” Pedagogy, Culture & Society. Vol. 16, No. 3, London: Routledge. p. 253–267.
Green, B. (2006) “English, literacy, rhetoric: changing the Project?” English Education.
40 (1). New South Wales: Charles Sturt University. pp. 7-19.
Pennell, B. (2010). “Curriculum Method 1: English”. EML441 Module 1. New South Wales:
Charles Sturt University.
Sawyer, W. (1998). “Board of Studies HSC Syllabus review 7/3/98”. BOS NSW English Forum
1998. New South Wales: Board of Studies.
Sawyer, W. and McFarlane, K. (2000). “Reviewing English in Years 7-10: A Report for the
Board of Studies, NSW”. New South Wales: The University of Western Sydney Nepean.
Sawyer, Wayne. (2005). “English Literacy: A More Open Marriage or a Time for Divorce?”
Literacy Learning in the Middle Years. 13 (1). p. 11-19.
Victorian Essential Learning Standards. (2009, Sept 11). “Standards – English”. Available at:
http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vels/english.html#. Accessed on: May 3, 2011.
Victorian Essential Learning Standards. (2009, September 16). “Introduction to English”.
Available at: http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/english/intro.html. Retrieved on: April 20, 2011.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples