Therefore, Wstern scientists are not expected to place too much weight on case histories (McCall, 2003). Mdical school teaches that the so-called anecdotal evidence is notoriously unreliable and subject to false attributions, i with distorted memory, slects only the favorable cases, ad deliberately manipulates. O the other hand, Estern science only has a treasury of anecdotal evidences but which are hard to ignore. Wile Western science would go for standards, masuring, ad parameters, Estern science would work with wholes and not with parts. Sme of yogas aims, lke ad enlightenment are said to be difficult if not impossible to quantify.
Wile Western science would never look at yoga as legitimate for the cure of diabetics, hart disease, sress, ad more, Estern science easily uses yoga techniques and has established institutions for the purpose. Aclassic example where Eastern science perspective should inspire Western science is in the matter of prognosis. Te Western approach would go for statistical parameters and when exceeded will indicate the syndrome. Lpton (2004) records that the American Heart Association (AHA) has identified 24% of population as having “metabolic syndrome" — a precursor to serious diseases like diabetes and cardiovascular problems such as high blood pressure.
Acording to AHA (mentioned in Lipton, 2004), wen three of the following five conditions are true, ptients have metabolic syndrome: Awaist circumference that exceeds 40 inches (men) or 35 inches (women); atriglyceride level of at least 150 milligrams per deciliter of blood (mg/dL); ad a level of HDL, te "good" cholesterol, blow 40 mg/dL in men and 50 mg/dL in women. Tese would include blood pressure of mm or higher; ad a fasting glucose levels of at least 110mg/dL(Ibid.
Erlier, MCall (2003) was saying the whole concept of a standardized protocol of Western science runs against what Eastern science believes therapy should be. Oientals believe each patient has a distinct case and cannot be lumped together with several others to be addressed with a ready-made case. Tey believe science is limited. Wth them, tere can be no standardized anything, bcause each patient is unique (Ibid. )Different bodies and minds, wth different abilities and weaknesses, rquire approaches. Bck the heart problem given earlier, D.
Buce (Lipton, 2004). ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples