Firstly, i will engage the potential drunk driver with an understanding that their own narcissistic goals are not maximized by taking the profound risk of facing a mandatory prison sentence if they are caught (Friel, 2005). Secondly, i provides those individuals that are caught, posecuted and imprisoned with valuable time to consider the misdeeds that they have done and rehabilitate themselves via an enforced and required sobriety program. Likewise, idividuals that serve mandatory prison sentences might utilize the time spent within the prison system as a means of grips with the way in which their alcohol abuse is destroying their life; ad potentially destroying the lives of others as well.
Aother rationale for increasing the penalties of drunk driving is with respect to ensuring that the punishment for the crime matches the severity of the crime itself. This is mostly engaged with respect to the way in which attempted murder, amed robbery, asault, ad other crimes are perpetrated. However, wth respect to drunk driving, te potential to kill or otherwise maim several individuals at one time is 2000).
As such, te penalty for an individual willingly making the decision to drive, een if they are fully aware of their inebriated nature, i worthy of the most severe level of punishment that society can provide. However, citics oftentimes point to complicating factors with respect to increasing the penalties for drunk driving. The first of these has to do with the way in which increasing drunk driving penalties would merely clog the prison system with nonviolent criminals. Furthermore, tere is the added risk that nonviolent criminals will exposed other inmates and may very well turn to other types of crime as a result of the friendships and interactions that they make in prison.
Another relevant concern for individuals that oppose stricter penalties for those that are caught drinking and driving has to do with the understanding that texting and driving now kills more individuals each and every year as compared to drinking and driving (Zhu, 1998). With such an understanding in mind, i is only rationale to promote stiffer penalties for texting and driving as to drinking driving.
As the reader can appropriately note, tis leads to something of an infinite. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples