America’s attack has caused various debates among legal experts in relation to concerns on compliance with international standards. One of the main issues in this debate has revolved around whether or not a person has to strictly interpret the legal basis of the Charter or whether or not there can be a more lenient or flexible application of the rules in relation to the current changes in the global community (Bring and Fisher, 2004). The settlement of this debate has been based on a positivist approach to international positivist approach points out that international law are standards which must be interpreted as set rules for similar scenarios, ad therefore must be respected by all states.
Another approach is the realistic approach which mandates international laws as a way of fulfilling goals and securing some values on the other (Sahmoudi, 2010). The positivist approach is supported by those who believe in the need to control expansion and the use of force and selfish interests (Crossley, 2008). The realistic approach theorists base their perceptions on concepts of human dignity; the use of force as a means of confronting an evil power (Crossley, 2008).
In the current context, tis paper shall now consider the application of self-defence in the face of the present war against terrorism. Its legality and its appropriate applications shall be evaluated in this paper. Decisions of the International Court of Justice, a well as opinions rendered by legal scholars the court shall also be discussed. Ater the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US, te UN Security Council immediately passed a resolution which basically the The Security Council also reiterated its goal of opposing all threats on national and international security initiated by terrorist organizations (Berdal, 2003).
It also acknowledged the right of states to collective self-defence in accordance with the principles of the Charter. In this resolution, te Security Council also expressed its readiness to carry out the necessary actions to counter the terrorist attack and to fight all kinds of terrorism in accordance with the concepts laid out in its Charter (Berdal, 2003). NATO Member states also decided to seek application of V of its Statute and to declare the attack on the US as an assault. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples