Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Analysis of the Statement - Private Life Should Mean What It Says

This is a preview of the 20-page document
Read full text

Ms Wyham to whom the matter was referred to, commented that the important issue is “ whether or not as a public servant, and as a member of a criminal justice organisation working with sex offenders and other vulnerable groups, Mr Pays activities in his private life, as depicted on the Internet are commensurate with his role as a probation officer and the public trust in him” . She noted that there might be an effect as to Mr Pay’ s disclosure of his relationship to Roissy especially “ on victims who looked the Probation Service for help” (Pay v Lancashire Probation Service [2003]).

She stated that such website information may be ‘ badly misinterpreted’ ” (Pay v Lancashire Probation Service [2003]). “ The Panel regards the nature of the actions shown in the photographs presented and Mr Pays participation in those acts, and also the advertising material for Roissy Workshops Ltd, as incompatible with the role and responsibilities of a Probation Officer. The Panel further takes the view that involvement in such activities by Mr Pay is additionally inappropriate, having regard to his work with offenders.

The Panel shares the view of the previous Panel … that the Probation Service has a responsibility to the public to demonstrate the integrity of its officers, and that public knowledge of Mr Pays activities would damage the reputation of the Service. The Panel does not accept that the decision to dismiss Mr Pay constitutes an infringement of his rights within the Human Rights Act 1998. The Panel note that Articles 8 and 10 … are qualified rights, and that due regard must be had to the protection health or morals, and the protection of the rights and freedom of others.

The Panel has deliberated upon the argument put forward on Mr Pays behalf that the Probation Service should have considered alternative employment for Mr Pay within the Service. The Panel, however, took the view that any such proposal was inappropriate, given its conclusion that the activities of Mr Pay had been found to be incompatible with the role of any Probation Officer” .

This is a preview of the 20-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Law, Philosophy, Media
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Law, Religion and Theology, People
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Analysis of the Statement - Private Life Should Mean What It Says
  • Pages: 20 (5000 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: Law
  • Level: Undergraduate
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us