John Leland and William Camden provided surveys of the English countryside, providing the drawings and descriptions and interpretations of the monuments they encountered. Thus, from such antiquarian establishments, people get the understanding of the past.Moreover, antiquarianism is the seed of modern archeology among several other disciplines, which is evidence of its significance in understanding the past. It is from Scandinavian antiquarians such as C. Thomsen and J. A Worsaae that proposed incorporation of modern dating systems such as stratigraphy and three age system, initiating further developments into understanding the past (Levine 2002, p. However, some critiques argued that antiquarianism forged little correlation linking the past and present as it only focused on the study of the relics and artifacts, and neglected the history part of such findings. Nonetheless, despite the antiquarians possibly lacking the understanding of cultural values and historical contest of the periods in study, their approaches such as reconstructing material culture of the past from their findings contributed significantly in understanding of the past. It facilitated the excavation of artifacts and their preservation for historical remembrance. Additionally, its contribution to historical study and development of archeology as a discipline are also among its achievements in contributing to the understanding of the past.Tentative progressions towards the systemization of archeology began with the Antiquarians with the enlightening of Europe in the 17th and 18th century. Archeology as a discipline developed officially from antiquarianism in 19th century (Greene & Moore 2010, p. Over the years, it developed several methodological and theoretical developments to understanding the past through archeological studies. These concepts include the following among many others.The three-age system is among these developments and its working focuses on classifying objects into one of three categories such as early, middle or modern age based on their design, material and characteristics among other features. It is useful for establishing the origin and history of virtually any artifact such as weapons, pottery or jewellery. It classifies archeological findings from clear indicators and is relatively cheap; however, it is theoretical hence dates may be inaccurate. Nonetheless,
Ferguson, J. (2009). Archaeology as a subject of antiquarian study. Charleston, BiblioLife.
Greene, K., & Moore, T. (2010). Archaeology. Hoboken, Taylor & Francis. Accesed from http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=544025.
Levine, P. (2002). The amateur and the professional: antiquarians, historians, and archaeologists in Victorian England, 1838-1886. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire], Cambridge University Press.
Marwick, B, Fairbairn, A, & O’Connor, S 2009, New Directons in Archeological Science (TA28), n.p.: ANU E Press, OAPEN Library, EBSCOhost, viewed 17th Marrch 2014
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples