Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

CTV building in Christchurch Essay Example

Show related essays

CTV building in Christchurch

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Read full text

Along with the owner and engineers as the city officials did not send a notice after the investigation based on the problems related with the CTV building. It is true that the CTV building got a green sticker after the 2010 earthquake despite the critical situation of building. Although the building was not eligible for yellow sticker but signalling authorities and group of engineers gave green signal to the building in order to achieve huge profit margin.In any earthquake prone zone, a building is to be designed according to the guidelines imposed by the government of that state. There were a number of people who were engaged in the designing of the building. There were chiefly three main entities: the Designer of the designer of the building, the company that the designer represented and the other management individuals of the company. The design component had two parts. The Structural Engineer was David Harding under the brand of Alan Reay Consultants Ltd and Alun Wilke Associates Architects was the architectural firm who had been employed for the construction of the building. Gerald Shirtcliff who supervised the construction under the name of William Fisher did not have a degree in engineering. Harding used to work under the guidance of Alan Reay, the owner of the firm.During the establishment of the building, the CTV building did not meet the standards. On the other hand, principle engineer and owner did not follow the regulations and legal aspects during the review process. Alan Ray was the principle engineer of this building. He did poor supervision and passed the review report to the structural engineer. However, owners and stakeholders did not even bother to review the building plans and rectify the challenges and issues accordingly. The government of New Zealand took one wrong decision by appointing city council for the investigation of the property. It was the key responsibility of City Council to employ a group of effective and professional engineers. This supervision team was lack of competence, skills and technical knowledge. Inadequate decision making process of city council is the major reason behind the collapse of the CTV building. The structural council design of council was lacking of experience. This inexperience and inadequate decision making process had taken away lives of several innocent people.IPENZ is trying to reveal the legal reasons behind the conspiracy and collapse. They are constantly meeting with the

This is a preview of the 6-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Engineering and Construction, Technology, Military
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Engineering and Construction, Information Technology, Agriculture
Hire a Writer
preview essay on CTV building in Christchurch
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us