Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Shells Authoritative Structure Essay Example

Show related essays

Shells Authoritative Structure

This is a preview of the 11-page document
Read full text

Shells Authoritative Structure. An authoritative structure, however, may result in a strong culture that may not be receptive to change (Mullins, 1999; Schein, 2004). The fact that Shell could transform themselves into their new structure is because of the already flexible and decentralized structure they had before the changes were enforced. A strong central authority may pose the danger of excessive manipulation from the corporate executives in terms of decision-making, which may cripple the lower operating units by giving them less autonomy. This is especially problematic as the operating units are the vital entities that deal with the end users, the customers, on a daily basis, and not having the power to make decisions may ultimately result in customer dissatisfaction.

This is true particularly for the new millennium due to increasing globalization, and the subsequent increase in demand to satisfy a global customer base. Hence the notion that the Shell Group ‘is a prisoner of its own illustrious past’ holds true, as the organization seems unwilling to change the way they operate at the corporate level.
As the case suggests, while their competitors have effectively managed structural changes, mergers, and acquisitions according to the demands of the industry, Shell is still in the act of catching up because of its relatively slow progression into the future, which is probably due to possible complacency at the corporate level. This may call for a deeper analysis into the corporate centers’ environments, both internal and external. The case confirms that after the successful restructuring, every business unit has been encouraged to be competitive with respect to its own product range in its own environment. This can be done through various strategic concepts like PEST analysis, which analyses the political, economic, sociological and technological aspects of any given environment that influence how a business emerges or operates in that environment (Kotler et al, 2008). Shells Authoritative Structure.

This is a preview of the 11-page document
Open full text


Adler, N. J. (1997) ‘Global Leaders: A Dialogue with Future History’, International Management, 1 (2): 21-33

Ansoff, H.I. (2007). Strategic Management. Palgrave McMillan: New York

Bartlett, C.A. (1995). ‘Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Structure to Processes’, Harvard Business Review Jan-Feb: 86-96

Brooks, I. (2003). Organisational Behaviour: Groups, Individuals and Organisation. 3rd ed. Pearson: Harlow

Child, J. (1988). Organisation: A Guide to Problems and Practice. 2nd ed. Paul Chapman: USA

Dubrin, A. J. (2004). Applying Psychology: Individual and Organisational Effectiveness. 6th ed. Pearson: New Jersey

Evans, W. A., Hall, K. C. And Salli, D. (1989). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Managerial Styles. Journal of Management Development, 8 (3), 5-13

Fritz, R. (1996). Corporate Tides: The Inescapable Laws of Organisational Structure. Berrett-Koehler: San Francisco

Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill: New York

Joyce, P., and Woods, A. (2002). Strategic Management: A Fresh Approach to Developing Skills, Knowledge and Creativity. Kogan Page: London

Keeley, T.D. (2001). International Human Resource Management in Japanese Firms. Palgrave, London

Kogut, B. (1993). Country Competitiveness: Technology and the Organising of Work. Oxford University Press: Oxford

Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Wong, V., and Saunders, J. (2008). Principles of Marketing. 5th ed. Pearson: Harlow

Mullins, L.J. (2003). Management and Organisational Behaviour. Pitman Publishing, London

Robbins, S.P. (2003). Organisational Behaviour. Prentice Hall, New York

Ohmae, K. (1982). The Mind of the Strategist. McGraw-Hill: London

Sadler, P. (2003). Strategic Management. 2nd ed. Kogan Page Limited: London

Schein, E.H. (1988). Organisational Psychology. 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall: London

Schein, E.H. (2004). Organisational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, San Francisco

Scullion, H. (1995) ‘International Human Resource Management’, Human Resource Management: A Critical Text. Routledge: London

Scullion, H., and Starkey, K. (2000) ‘The Changing Role of the Corporate Human Resource Function in the International Firm’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11 (6): 1061-81

Stahl, M. J., and Grigsby, D. W. (1997). Strategic Management: Total Quality and Global Competition. Blackwell: Oxford

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Management, Human Resources, Marketing
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Management, Business, Macro & Microeconomics
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Shells Authoritative Structure
  • Pages: 11 (2750 words)
  • Document Type: Essay
  • Subject: Management
  • Level: Undergraduate
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us