This idea can be deemed as a negative one owing to the fact that Plato was rigid in this idea where all other forms of governance were rather unacceptable and imperfect to him. This is a huge limitation to his theory which was later perfected by other modern philosophers.Had Plato been alive to see the chaos in the world today, he would have been attributed the entire basis of chaos to the lack of education and wisdom. Plato would definitely have an issue with the way the political institutions have emerged today and how the institutions are formed. Nowadays, where the iron triangle is at play where military and economics has an equal share of responsibility in the management of the affairs of the state to that of the political machinery. This intermingling, according to Plato, is what has led the world to take such wrong decisions that the distinction between moral and immoral has deteriorated. He would have encouraged and lobbied for a kind of republic where all institutions should come under the political machinery and taken over their own responsibilities rather than mingling with the political affairs. Thus, he would have advocated stronger political institutions free of intervention from those not wise enough to handle these affairs.Thus, conclusively Plato is a Greek Philosopher who belonged to a wealthy family and thus received education in Philosophy, music and other disciplines. He gave many intriguing ideas in philosophy, based on what he was taught by Socrates. However, his most intriguing theory is that where he advocates for a philosopher king to handle the affairs of the state, though the theory has its own limitations. Had Plato been alive to see the chaos in the world today, he would have been attributed the entire basis of. The Dialogues of Plato.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples