Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Biomedical Ethics

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Read full text

Of these two rather ethical considerations, o one side, te physician feels compelled to do what he believes is in the best interest of the patient. O the other hand, te patient feels that it is his right to refuse medication based on his own grounds. Under these circumstances, hw far is the physician expected to go with his persistence. Mst legal cases, nt only in Starson’s case, oten uphold the position of the patient. Tis is referred to as patient autonomy. The principle of patient autonomy states that patients have the opportunity to choose among medically indicated treatment and to refuse any unwanted treatment.

Uder these circumstances, te physician must respect the patient’s decision. It is necessary to understand that treatment decisions are not only based on objective medical considerations but also involve a considerable level of personal value judgments and preferences (Meier, Dane, Iaacs and Hughes 95). Therefore, t some extent, te physician may compel a patient to take a certain medication not only because it is the right and objective medical step but also because feels, bsed on his values and preferences, i is the right thing.

For the latter, h is imposing his personal feelings, nt professional mandate, t the patient. In these cases, aphysician maybe ethically driven to compel a patient to take medication because he feels it is the right thing to do. Hwever, i is essential to note that a physician demonstrates respect for human dignity, abiomedical ethical consideration, wen he acknowledges the freedom and right of the patient to make choices based on their own beliefs and values (Kluge Prhaps another consideration arising from Starson’s case is the idea of sound medical treatment.

Starson, fr some reason, flt that the medication offered was disruptive it would interfere with his ability to complete his physics research. Indeed, pysicians are ethically forbidden to administer unsound treatments. In this case, sund treatment refers to the use of medical knowledge or means to cure, pevent a medical disorder, peserve life, o relieve distressing symptoms (Meier, Dane, Iaacs and Hughes 96). Sound medication arises from the principle of beneficence and non maleficence.

principle of non maleficence bars physicians from utilizing their medical knowledge to cause harm to the patient. O the other hand, te principle of beneficence requires that a physician utilize his...

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Open full text
Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Philosophy, Politics, Science
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Philosophy, Gender & Sexual Studies, People
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Biomedical Ethics
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us