With this in mind, it becomes obvious that since everyone agrees on the reality of the object, then everyone would agree on a single color for it. In other words, it is true that there is a choice of three, but for convenience of communication and understanding the world, people would agree on one since that makes sense. Therefore, the call of Russell to doubt the existence of reality should be dismissed.In addition to that, the end of the chapter seems to be quite far from its beginning. In other words, the original question was to find a kind of knowledge that everyone would agree on, but the philosopher seems to be looking for answer to a different question. In addition to that, the logical outcome of Russell’s considerations urges people to doubt many fundamental facts that they take for granted. Indeed, this approach may be useful if a person wants to develop an objective and unbiased understanding of a particular project, but the perspective that is advocated by Russell is too broad and, therefore, it is hardly useful. Indeed, if people doubt the relationship between sense data and physical objects this would lead to a complete re-evaluation of the entire array of knowledge that was collected by the people so far. Bertrand Russells criticism of direct realism.
Banks, Erik C. The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James and Russell: Neutral Monism Reconceived. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014. Print.
Feinberg, Joel. Reason and Responsibility;. Belmont, CA: Dickenson Pub., 2013. Print.
Griffin, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.
Irvine, Andrew D. Language, Knowledge and the World. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.
Ongley, John, and Rosalind Carey. Russell: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum, 2013. Print.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples