Facebook Pixel Code
x
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Bertrand Russells criticism of direct realism Essay Example

Show related essays

Bertrand Russells criticism of direct realism

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Read full text

Bertrand Russells criticism of direct realism. In addition to that, every new state of the observer changes the perception of the object dramatically. Indeed, Russell notes that a table that is seen from far away can appear to be a tiny object. However, the same table if looked upon through the microscope will appear to be huge. In addition to that it will reveal almost a new world that is fully of cracks and valleys, urging the observer to change the perception of the object from a more or less unified to a complex one.Closer to the end of the chapter the philosopher in question admits that while different scholars would look at the issue of the table in a different way, they are likely to agree that the table exists. In other words, no matter what perceptions they adhere to, they would also accept the fact that the physical object produces sense dat.

With this in mind, it becomes obvious that since everyone agrees on the reality of the object, then everyone would agree on a single color for it. In other words, it is true that there is a choice of three, but for convenience of communication and understanding the world, people would agree on one since that makes sense. Therefore, the call of Russell to doubt the existence of reality should be dismissed.In addition to that, the end of the chapter seems to be quite far from its beginning. In other words, the original question was to find a kind of knowledge that everyone would agree on, but the philosopher seems to be looking for answer to a different question. In addition to that, the logical outcome of Russell’s considerations urges people to doubt many fundamental facts that they take for granted. Indeed, this approach may be useful if a person wants to develop an objective and unbiased understanding of a particular project, but the perspective that is advocated by Russell is too broad and, therefore, it is hardly useful. Indeed, if people doubt the relationship between sense data and physical objects this would lead to a complete re-evaluation of the entire array of knowledge that was collected by the people so far. Bertrand Russells criticism of direct realism.

This is a preview of the 5-page document
Open full text

Works Cited

Banks, Erik C. The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James and Russell: Neutral Monism Reconceived. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014. Print.

Feinberg, Joel. Reason and Responsibility;. Belmont, CA: Dickenson Pub., 2013. Print.

Griffin, Nicholas. The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003. Print.

Irvine, Andrew D. Language, Knowledge and the World. London: Routledge, 1999. Print.

Ongley, John, and Rosalind Carey. Russell: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum, 2013. Print.

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Philosophy, Media, Archaeology
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Philosophy, Law, History
Hire a Writer
preview essay on Bertrand Russells criticism of direct realism
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us