Facebook Pixel Code
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

The Case of Narni Pty Ltd V National Australia Bank Limited Essay Example

Show related essays

The Case of Narni Pty Ltd V National Australia Bank Limited

This is a preview of the 8-page document
Read full text

The Case of Narni Pty Ltd V National Australia Bank Limited. The overdraft agreement without any prior notice, is in breach of the agreed agreement and in consequence they suffered loss of the business (McCracken & Everett, 2009)1.As the matter came before court, the claimant argued that the defendant had breached an implied term (and other terms of the overdraft), however, of great concern is the implied term. Following the case critically, it’s evident that as the claimants argue, it’s implied that the continued financial aid given to them by the National Australian Bank would continue. The court found out that as a matter of legal principle, there was indeed an implied term between the Narni and the bank thus the defendant could not null the agreement or alter it in anyway without reasonable notice to the claimant to have enough time to re-arrange their affairs and that cheques had previously been honored under the current pre-existing agreement, so the implication was that there was arrangement between the parties since the bank knew that the claimant solely relied on them.

In the case of State Bank of New South Wales Court ltd vs. Carrabubula Holdings pty ltd (2001), the bank that was the claimant in its appeal raised inter alia the following issue that there was the breach of implied term, the appellate judge, Giles JA, held that the implied term had been breached and that this term arose from the dealings between the bank and its customer (defendant) the trial judge viewed the implied term as that which gives the business efficacy to contract, BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings however, Giles JA overturned the trial judge views stating that the efficacy of the banking business does not depend on the uncertainty of the terms.Narni Pty Ltd sued the National Australia Bank Limited on grounds that lending or borrowing is always an issue of contract, be it expressed on paper or implied by the deeds of the parties involved. In banking, the implied terms are only derived where necessary or where the parties intended the terms in order to be certain that the agreement shall operate effectively.Since the claimant dealt in business and had a contractual relationship with the bank, the implied terms had to be construed in such a way as to give the consumer (Narni Nursing Home) protection over the service provider (National Australian Bank) and vise versa. In Australia, the contract between account holder and the bank is a legal binding agreement enforceable under the law and shall. The Case of Narni Pty Ltd V National Australia Bank Limited.

This is a preview of the 8-page document
Open full text


Tyree, A. & Weaver. P. (2006), Weerasooria’s Banking Law and the Financial System in Australia. (6th Ed) LexisNexis Butterworths

Martin, R. (2008), Banking and Finance in Principle, Thomson Lawbook Co.

McCracken, S. & Everett. A.(2009), Banking and Financial Institutions Law, Thomson Lawbook Co.

Close ✕
Tracy Smith Editor&Proofreader
Expert in: Business, E-Commerce, Marketing
Hire an Editor
Matt Hamilton Writer
Expert in: Business, Finance & Accounting, Macro & Microeconomics
Hire a Writer
preview essay on The Case of Narni Pty Ltd V National Australia Bank Limited
WE CAN HELP TO FIND AN ESSAYDidn't find an essay?

Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples

Contact Us