Thus, i is quite likely that some of the variations in responses could be due to natural fluctuation and may not be true chances in trends at all. I some parts of the report, oly a part of the trends observed have been used to define the nature of changes. Athough the report claims to be studying changes as they occur from 1999 till 2002, wen discussing some of the fear of threats and the extent of business plans the reported changes only apply to changes from 2002.
I the data is carefully observed, te percentages for 1999 and 2002 are quite similar for many categories with a fluctuation in 2001. Tis may be considered an important misrepresentation of facts (Downing and Clark, 2010). Tis fact is not mentioned anywhere, ad the verbal report is written as if there is a linear change from 1999 till 2002. Wile some of the categories in which the responses were invited allowed the respondent to choose more than one response, sme seem to have required the respondent to choose only the possible responses.
Fr some such questions, al responses are not accounted for. Fr example, te percentages for the frequency with which BHP is rehearsed and the attitudes towards regulation do not total to 100%. I is possible that a few participants may have withheld from responding, bt this is not mentioned in the report (Levine, Kehbiel, Brenson and Viswanathan, 2008). Athough a small percentage in either case, tese omissions can affect the integrity of the report (Downing and Clark, 2010). Fr some questions, oly partial data was communicated the Oe example is the review of how the responsibility for BCM was viewed by the respondents.
Oly the data about two categories was mentioned although there was a fall in the percentages of respondents selecting each of those categories in the most recent survey. I order to understand the changes in the trends adequately, i is necessary to examine which categories saw a rise in responses even if these still form a minority (Howitt and Cramer, 2008). Sch data would be helpful in predicting future trends with more Fnally, aequate has not been offered to support some of the claims made.
Te report claims that the data gathered makes the case for using BCM, bt only reports partial statistics of the responses with regards to. ..
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples