Hence, our CRM program justifies our ability to operate safely in Australia, as it is unparalleled in the international aviation industry. Furthermore, Pavlovian Airlines routinely collects safety incident data and utilizes logistic regression methodology to determine an odds ratio that will predict which areas of operations and decision-making requires training-based adjustment. This methodology is modeled against a model for predicting the potential risk of aviation incidents related to human skills and decision-making provided by Walker and Bills (2008) designed to quantify where safety-related issues require addressing through appropriate training programs. Combined with an intensive psychometric testing procedure which measures the socio-psychological capabilities and deficiencies of all employees throughout the entire organizational model, we have the capability to virtually eliminate all risk factors associated with human capacity that could potentially contribute to safety incidents and accidents. While other airlines conduct qualitative analyses which are based on subjective interpretation, Pavlovian Airlines quantifies its best practice approaches based on hard data and statistical analyses to identify our existing weaknesses and predict future safety capacity. Arguing Blockage of Pavlovian Airlines in Australia and a High Court Determination.
ATSB. (2009). An overview of human factors in aviation maintenance, Australian Transport Safety Bureau. [online] Available at: http://www.atsb.gov.au/media/27818/hf_ar-2008-055.pdf (accessed 30 March 2015).
ATSB. (2008). Evaluation of the human factors analysis and classification system as a predictive model, Australian Transport Safety Bureau. [online] Available at: http://www.dviaviation.com/files/45147192.pdf (accessed 1 June 2015).
Bartsch, R. (1996). Aviation law in Australia. Sydney: LBC Information Services.
CASA. (2015). Human Factors Activities: Human Factors in CASA, Civil Aviation Safety Authority. [online] Available at: http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD::pc=PC_100997 (accessed 1 June 2015).
Enright, C. (2010). Legal technique. Sydney: The Federation Press.
Helmreich, R.L., Merritt, A.C. and Wilhelm, J.A. (1999). The evolution of crew resource management in commercial aviation, International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, pp.19-32.
Hobbs, A. and Williamson, A. (2002). Skills, rules and knowledge in aircraft maintenance: errors in context, Ergonomics, 45, pp.290-308.
Inglis, M., Sutton, J., & McRandle, B. (2007). Human factors analysis of Australian aviation accidents and comparison with the United States. Canberra: Australian Transport Safety
Learmount, D. (2004). Annual accident survey, Flight International, January, pp.34-36.
Martinussen, M. and Hunter, D.R. (2010). Aviation psychology and human factors. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Nagel, D.C. (1988). Human factors in aviation. San Diego: Academic Press.
Reason, J. and Hobbs, A. (2003). Managing maintenance error: a practical guide. Ashgate: Aldershot.
Walker, M.B. and Bills, K.M. (2008). Analysis, causality and proof in safety investigations. Canberra: Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples