The arguments used by the researchers are logical as they build upon one another in a systematic manner. Different points of view are considered in making judgements and conclusions in line with international research standards. Both the positive and negative sides of the SLR are considered in light of professional reviews are presented in the article without any glaring bias. It is, therefore, noted from the literature review that care is taken to avoid any form of bias during the study. Counter-arguments are considered in respect of SLR as noted above.While the study highlights the methodology used by the two authors in conducting the study, much detail is not presented. Furthermore, how the data was analysed remains a mystery to the audience in as much as qualitative data was used. One other question that comes to the fore is in regard to the ethical considerations applied during the study. The researchers do not state the ethical considerations that they applied or how they overcame ethical issues that may have arisen during the study in as much as participant privacy seems to have been respected.The currency of any study impacts its practicability with the passage of time. The study conducted by Armitage’s and Keeble-Allen’s was done in 2008 and is well within the limit of time to be considered current. As such, the conclusions and findings of the study remain practical and credible today as they were when initially published about four years ago. While the study is conducted based on scientific methods, the sample size of four is quite small and could impact on the universality of the research. One assumption that applies to the study conducted by the two. Armitages and Keeble-Allens Undertaking a structured Literature Review or Structuring a Literature Review, Tales from the Field Article Critique.
Please type your essay title, choose your document type, enter your email and we send you essay samples